fco-21-189-officials-wishing-to-visit-uk-and-refusal-of-visas — Page 1

National Archives 英國國家檔案館 All

FART

File No.

FCN 22/1

(N.D. The grading of this jacket must be the same as that of the highest
graded document contained in it. The appropriate upgrading slip must be
affixed when ever necessary)

CONFIDENTIAL

t

t

FOREIGN

OFFICE

DEPT.

FAR EASTERN

TITLE: FORMOSA: TRAVEL & PASSPORTS: U.K,

COMMONWEALTH & COLONIES: VISAS FOR

REFER TO

REFER TO

REFER TO

-י -ו-חזי

DEPT.

NAME

JBD

DM

DM

----

9/2.

DATE DEPT.

NAME

DATE DERT.

NAME

DATE

8/2

---

<p>&nbsp;<span></span></p><!--more--><p></p>

. .

-ייווי וזהו- r-וו--

P.A

Ta. TE

EOS

203

Reporting

Req...

17

21/2 22/2

23/2

ים יר

...

DO NOT RETAIN FILES AND PAPERS UNNECESSARILY

RETURN THEM TO REGISTRY FOR B.U. OR P.A.

OPENED

8-2-67

FILE

CLOSED

NITY GRADING

FILE No.

FCN 22/1

(Na, The Frading of this jacket must be the same as that of the highest
graded dwemment contained in it. The appropriate upgrading slip must be
affixed when ever necessary.)

CONFIDENTIAL

· FI

יויו--

PART

IL LIL

ATTI- ~I~~ ILL

....

י

Dind

JB 14/10.

CONFIDENTIAL

:CD IN

A"CHIV 273"

1 100CT 18

FCN22/1

FOREIGN OFFICS, 8.3.1.

14 October, 1968.

pas 10/10

Visits of Businessmen and Officiul. son Talyan

21

#hen you called on the Deportment before your return to Taiwan you asked
to be sent Jetails of the new guidelines we have adopted for issuing
entry visas to "Nationalist" Chinese,

2. For practical purposes six estegories of individuals are
distinguished:

(a) Private individuals who is ve no connexion with any

"Nationalist" organis. tion.

(b) Individuals who are officials of "Nationaliьt" government

controlled organizations, such as the Taiwan Power Company, which
although state-owned, operute for purely business purposes, i.e. they
are equivalent to British k☺ilways or the Central Electricity Generating
Board in this ecuntry.

(c) Kembers of delegations to international trade fairs, sports

teoma etc., claimin, to represent the "Republic of China".

(a) Officials of the Taiwan Provincial or Taipah Municipal

Authorities, who do not come under categories (e) and (f) below.

(e) Officials of departments of the "Nationalist" government which are
concerned purely with trading and economic affairs e.g. the Textiles
Levulopment Committee in the Ministry of "conomic Affairs.

(r) officials of other departner ts of the "Tationalist"

3.

government, including "istionaliɛt" Ambassadors abroad.

The position now is that visas ill be rented unconditionally to those in
categoric. (a), (b) erå (4), and to those in category (c) provided an
agreement can be reached whereby reference to the *Republic of China"
can be avoided. In general, visas will be granted to those in cutegory
(a), but we stall wish to scrutinize each particular applie: tion in the
light of all the circumstances prevailing at the time Those in category
(f) will be refused

visas unless:

(1) they are attending a conference in the United

Kingdom of a United Nationa Agency;

(11)

(iii)

R. J. Bray, Esq., TAMSUÌ.

or

they come under United Nations sponsorship;

they come as tourists in a private capacity for

■ short period and give an undertaking (which, incidentally, we could
not legally enforce) to engage in no political activity while they are

here.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

- 2 -

4. These guidelines, which were approved in June, change our earlier
position by easing the restrictions on those in categories (ă) and (e).
Formerly they could not visit the United Kingdom in their official
capacities.

5. The change for category (d) was made in order to remove the anomaly
of excluding officials of the Provincial and Municipal authorities to
whom you are accredited.

6. The reason for the change in category (e) is solely in the interests
of trade. Since most Taiwan trade is either run or closely involved with
the state, we were putting British firms under an unreasonable handicap
in denying them contact here with influential officials.

7.

The change in this category was considered to have some importance in
relation to implied recognition. However we concluded that if questioned
in Parliament we could argue that each time we issue a visa or affidavit
we deny recognition afresh by refusing to accept a "Nationalist"
passport. More serious is the possible Chinese reaction to this
relaxation; but as the existence of the Consulate in Tamsui already
gives them ample scope to accuse us of a "two-China" policy, we thought
that the admission of a few officials from "Nationalist" Ministries
concerned exclusively with trading and economic affairs would not
substantially worsen our position.

H

8. Just after the new guidelines had been drawn up we decided not to
issue a visa to Mr. James Wei, Director of the Government Information
Office in Taipei. At the time this was regarded as a test case. Two
Members of Parliament argued that Mr. Wei's visit would be private, but
he had applied in his official capacity and we took this to be an
adequate reason for refusing entry. Had he applied as a tourist the
decision might have been different. Te prefer not to be too restrictive
on this question, but, as you know, we always have to keep an eye on
Peking. Though it may often be possible to grant a visa to those in
category (1), provided they have applied as private individuals for a
short visit, we would wish to scrutinize each case, Some applications
coming under category (e) will be entirely straightforward, but as
borderline cases will be frequent it will be best to refer to London all
such cases, and any others about which you are in any doubt. We would in
any case like to have warning of the arrival of Nationalist visitors who
might turn out to be controversial even though they fall within
categories to which we do not raise objection.

(J. B. Denson) Far Eastern Department

CONFIDENTIAL

BEM IS 1.0MAN

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

CONFIDENTIAL

Registry RN22/ DRAFT letter (final)

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION' To:-

Top Secret

Secret.

Confidential o

Restricted Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Coulder

Mc Brag

Tamsui

Type 1 +

From

21

I ain Clar

No. & PXL.

Départment

Visits of Businessmen ord Officials from Taiwan

When

before your

you

Officing

called on the Department

vetem to Taiyan you asked to

be sent details of the new guidelines we here adopted for insulding
entry visas to "Nationalist" Chineal.

2. For practical purposes six categories of individual are
Distinguishe":

(9) Private jadividual who have no conmagine with any "Natimatist"
organization.

(6) had writuals who are officials of "Nationalist government controlled
organizations, such as the Taiwan Power Company, which although
state-owned, operate for purely business purpised/, l.e. they are
equivalent to British Railways on the central Electricity generating
Board in mis country,

(c) / Members of delegations to international trade tais, sports teams
etc., claiming to reppesent the "Republic of China".

(g) Officials of the Taiwan Provincial of

aipeh Municipal Authorities, who do not me under categories (e) and (+)
below. (e) Official of departments of the "Natimalist" government which
are concomed purely

with trading and exmovies affairs -e.g. the Textiles Development
Committee in the Ministry of

Economic Affairs.

(f) Officials of other departments of the "Nationalist" government, we
lading "Nationalht"

Ambuscadors abroad,

3. The position now is that visas/will be granted to unconditionally to
those in categoria (9),(b) and (d), and to those in category (s) praided
an agreement can be reached whereby reference to the "Republic of China"
can be avoided. In general, vines will be granted to Mose in category
(e), b

but we shall wish to scrutininge each particular application in the
light of all the cire unstareg prevailing at the time. Those in category

will visas

(F) will be refused visas unters

(1) they are attending a conference in

the United Kinglan /ot a cuited Nations Agency; (ii) they cake under
United Nations

the spnsorship; fr

(iii) they formed as tourists in a private capacity for a short period
and give are undertaking (which, incidentally, we could not Legally
enforce) to

engage

activity while they are here.

political

4. These fuitelings, which were approved in

June, change

our earlier position by easing the restricting on those in categories
(d)anke), Formerly they could not visit the United Kingdom in their
official capacities.

5. The change for category (d)

Why

табе

in order to remove the anomaly of excluding

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

1

BENGTS VERWA

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential.

Restricted. Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

CONFIDENTIAL

DRAPE Letter (tival) -continent. Type 1 +

To:-

5-canti.

From

Telephone No. & BIL,

Department

solely in the intulut's A

Krade.

officials of the Provincial and Municipal

HM authorities to whom Hill Insuls accredited.

With

76. The reason to the charge in et category (e) why can medial. Since
most Taiwan trade is either oun or closely superaret by the state, we
were putting british firms under an unreasmable Handicap in denying them
contact here with in Muential officials

in

in tertin

consideed fult to

делу

The change in this catermy was have some yxortance in coching of wips
had recogniting. However, we folly that if questiomed

Parliament

we could argue that each time we indą a visa an

a visa in affidavit we vecognition afresh by refusing to accept a
"Nationalist "passport. More serving is the pasuble chinex reaction to
this relaxation; fout as the bistence of the Crowlate at in Tamoni
already gives them ample scope accuse no of a "pro-China" policy, we
thought that the admiss in of a few officials from "Natimalist
Ministries concerned the lusively with trading and economic affairs
would not substantially worsen our position.

7. Just after the new guidelines had loven

to

Trawn up we decided not to issue a vis a to Mt. James Wei, Director of
the Government information Office in Taipei. At the time this was
regarded as a test case. Two Meaubers of Parliament argued that 14th
Wei's visit would be private, but he had applied in his official
capacity and we took this to be an adequate reason for refusing entry.
Had the

that is a tourist the rescisin might have bazen different. We pater not
to be trovestricting on this question, but

1, as you know, we always have to keep an eye on / Peking. Thought it
may often be possible to grant a visa to those in category (*), provided
they have applied as

appo

private individuals for a shot voit, we would wish to scrativnige each
case. Some applications coming under category (e) will be entirely
straight forward, but be borderline cases with the sent it will be best
to

all

veter/all

such case, Kotbe, and

былок

Other

оту

адни

dower. Wer word in my

wowr

which

any

Com

like to home Waing ofon

akitud 1

Nationdut victors

who might thin

km

contriweni wen

though the foll

within entuguris Yo wanis ww

du sunt dav

mjutim.

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Ed (5084)

Reference

P

20

pa

раско

14/10

M=Denson

L

REC. D IN

ARCHIVES No.31

16 OCT 1968

FN22/1

Taiwan Visa Regulations

M=

When M. Drag visit?

on October 8th headed

incing visas

for details of our revised policy

to chinese Nationalists to be sent to Tambui.

2. I enclose a draft letter

subject.

Me above

M

I am C.dor

"/10.

9 Munk this hand benton

Am

Mar.

11160.

18

En Clair

PRIORITY TAKSUI TO FOREIGN OFFICE

Telno. 27

LASSIFIED

14 October 1968

• RELIVED IN [ARCHIV No.31

15 OCT 1968

FEB/22/1

Your telegram No. 43: [Nationalist Chinese Visas]

No local application or issue.

19

F

4016/10

Mr. Brereton

77777

FILES

F.E.D.

Mig & Visa Dept.

18

KEO

KEF

Faws2/1

Cypher/Cat, A

RESTRICTED

f.a.

to 18/10

11 October, 1968 (F)

II OFFICE TO TAKSUI

Telno. 43

RESTRICTED

We have learned that a Nationalist Chinese General,

So Peng, is in London with a Kr. Wong also a Nationalist.

Passport Control have no records. Please confirm that you issued visas
and send details.

SOSFA

PILES

F.E.D.

HIG. & VISA SECTION

ON

19

RESTRICTED

18

...d

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry No. FEN22/1

DEPARTMENT

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION PRIORITY MARKINGS

Top Secre Secres

Restricted

Immediate

Routine

}

PRIVACY MARKING

in Confidence

[Security

(Date).

* Date and time (G.M.T.) telegram should

roach addressee(s)......

Despatche

18

CYPHER

Security classification" classification] -if any

LIL

RESTRICTED

..

[

Privacy marking -if any

1

Cyphe

Draft Telegram to:-

TAMBUL

No.

43...

[Godeword--if any)

Addressed to

telegram No.

And to

+-

HITTIN➖➖--------

(Dase) 14/12. repeated for information to

And to:-

----ו-יוו.

Saving to...

Repeat to:-

****, DPE----¶¶---------------DETETARET ALLEENA PA

(date)

LILL-

-tu

LEARNED

................L‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒... -- INILLON .. -DILLALLI

also a

Nationalert

We have learned that a Natimatest

Chinese General, SO PENG, is in Lorin

делать. with another Natimatist friend, M= WONGY no Paropat control have
no vents. Please confirm

inued visas and send details.

you

RECORDS

Saving to:-

mat

Distribution:-

Files

ifre

FEY) PCO

Copies to:-

to 11/10

CONFIDËT SI AL

FCM Ja

DiD

Lealy

PORFIGN OFFICE, S.W.1.

17

31 July, 1968.

за кожно

Mr. Chan-Chien Chan, a Nationaldat Chinese has applied for a visa to
visit the United Kingdom. I enclose copy of his application form. Je
would sen strong political objection to the isspa of a visa to him.

2. ne have recently fermulated new internal guidelines an the admission
of Nationalist Chinese, As you know, we do not recognise the Nationalist
authorities on Taiwan, Our trade with the Teople's Republic of China far
exceeds the volume of trade we could ever hope to do with Taiwan. The
Chinese Government is particularly sensitive about any action which
might imply reosgnition, however limited, of the Nationalist
authorities. It is our policy therefore to avoid so far as possible
diving grounds for accusations that we are giving even tacit
recognition. This is reflected in the criteria we have adapted. For
practical purposes we distinguish six sategories of parsons:

(a)

(b)

(e)

(a)

(•)

Private individuals and businessmen who imve no connection with any
Nationalist organisation;

Individuals who are officials of Nationalist government centrolled
organisations, such as the Taiwan Power Company, which although
state-owned, operated for purely business purposes, 1.e. they are
equivalent to British Railways of the Central Electricity Generating
Board in this country;

Bembers of delegations to intern¬tional trade fairs, sports teams, etc.,
cănining to represent the "Republic of China";

Officials of the Taiwan Provincial or Taipeh Municipal Authorities, who
do not come under astagories (a) and (F) below;

Officials of departments of tnc nutionalist government which are
cenoërned purely with trading and economic affairs - 0.8. the Textiles
Development Committee in the Ministry of Economic Affairs;

(1) Officials of other departments of the Nationalist government,

including Nationalist Azbasaɔdors abroad.

Under existing practice we should reise no objection to the grant of
visas to those in astagories (a) and and to those in catagory

7(0)

Kiss X, X. Csatas, 0.B.5.,

Immigration & Nationality Department,

Home Office,

271-277 High Helborn, 4.0.1.

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

N

(e) provided an agreement could be recebed whereby reference to the
"Republic of China" could be avoided. For commerciṣ1 reasons" only, we
would raise no objection to category (d). Sinos Hall. Consul in Tamsui
is accredited to the provincial authorities of Taiwan, it would be
anomalous to exclude category (4) provincial officials. že accept
category (a) as a calculated risk.

The

visas are not stamped in Betionalist passports, and affidavita are
i"sued. This in itself is a denial of recognition though the Nationalist
authorities could publisk¢the visits if they wished.

Le still oppose the issue of visas to persons in category Calessi

(1) they are attending a conference in the United Kingdom of a

United Nations egenGY;

(ii) they osue under U.HI. sponsorship; (11)

or

(111) they come as tourists in a private capacity for a shart

period.

Br. Cham-Chien Chax falls clearly into category (f). Tot only is he a
member of the Legislative Yuen; he is Commandant of the National dær
College and Director of a section of the Central Committee of the
I.M,T., the ruling party. He claims that he wants to study "social
welfare". Even if this is correct, he would be in a position to make
contact with overseas Chinese and his visit could cause sa considerable
embarrassaɔnt. I trust therefore that you will agree that a visa should
not be issued to Mr. Chan.

5. I hope you will find these confidential guidelines, which have been
spɔroved by Tinisters, helpful, In future cases, you sy

assume that any objection we raise to an individual is because he does
not fall inte one of the special cutegories in para. 2 (a) to (a) above,

(J. 3. Dansen ) Far Eastern Department

MUID KITIAL

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

DENIS KRAK

CONFIDENTIAL

Registry No.

DRAFT

Letter

Type 1 +

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

To:

From

Top Secret.

Secret.

Miss K.N. Coates, 0.8.E), Immigration & Nationality

Mr. Denson

Telephone No. & Ext

Confidential MH/ad;

Department, Home Office.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.