File References
(188)
Page 212
2. It would help in discussions to
have your estimates of values of four
lots of land referred to in paragraph 2
-
of your savingram No.2187/57 also
indication of use to which lots likely
to be put if -
(a) given up to Hong Kong Government
(b) sold on open market.
Grateful also for any other information
Your views
about lots (and in particular/about soundness Its title which
lots
of/War Department claims to title)
likely to be useful to us.
3. Fact that matter is to be discussed
meaus
further makes it most unlikely that
no
decision on additional units can be
taken before departure of 74th L.A.A.
Regiment. We much regret this and will
regarding replace uncuts do all possible to secure decision
earliest.
Ends.
SECER.
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
Page 212
Page 212
(P8086) 71431/7382 IM 5/57 AT&S. 768.
PRIORITY MARKINGS of 283
Emergency Immediate Prioril
Reply rgently required Nil
Mr. Fairclough
"/
In
Mr..
1. Wallau
Mr..
Mr..
A. Campbell
Ve
Sin Constans.
Permt. U.S. of S.
Parly. U.S. of S.
Minister of State
Secretary of State
File No. DEF 75/51/02.....
3 DRAFTS
*TELEGRAM
**SAVINGRAM
* Delete whichever is inapplicable. If necessary, "Priority" may be inserted before “Savingram.”
Addressed
Prionts
(Insert appropriate priority marking)
Govenor
HONG KONG
NOT
No.
113 drafts.
SECURITY, ETC., MARKINGS
Page 23.01 283
Secret
Confidential
Restricted Unclassified Personal Guard
Draft B
Repeated
(Insert appropriate priority marking)
No.
ENCLOSURES
(Savingrams only)
MEDIUM
En clair Code
X Cypher XX
"Delete whichever
is inapplicable)
SAVINGRAMS ONLY
FOR USE IN TELEGRAPH BRANCH.
Your reference
Despatched..
Code
On......
195
Cypher OTP Simplex En clair
At
Hrs.
TOP SECRET
(Insert appropriate security, etc., marking)
File
References
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
DISTRIBUTION AND
FURTHER ACTION
external
No y distribution
Recic BEF 127/337/07 15
comsider criculor
(203)
Part B
Your telegram No. 97.
Love ;
Following from Wallage.
Begins.
Garrison.
Points made in your telegram under reference were
carefully considered before matter came up for discussion at
recent Defence Committee meeting. We of course take the
points you made and do not dispute that from Hong Kong's
point of view line set out in your para. 5 would be best.
Nonetheless we felt that from tactical point of view there might
bebe
would be better chance of securing some additional U.K.
contribution to defence of Hong Kong over and above six major
units already agreed if proposal made by Grantham in para. 6 00
of his telegram No. 983/57 were pursued (despite local diffi-
on naval disposition (179) or as requested by A Campbell
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.