I attach
a
ift for consu.
There is still hope,
I think, that there is likely to be "advantage in
sharp object lesson at the present time
providing
(para 3 of 10)
situation.
that this actio
may
clear the
I have spoken to M' Oakeshott
indicated abwe,
samething
in
ви
the lines
He
agrees
that there
be
may
the argument (though confirmation is
desirable before we accept (b)) and will ring
tamwrow, when he has studied the tel's more
You
theranyhly
1
discussed the matter in the F.O.
√.d. Anderm 17/1
I discussed (1) *(5) with the Dukeshalt, the F.O. agree
that we and support the line taken by the for. They
happy to leave the drafting of any "afferual statement" and of (5)-
to He for & would not wish to see it, I agree as
ague as I do not
thats there wild to time to clear one & the for is in the best
porities to decide the fore of the statement.
I love the statement at × of (2) does not mean
Ike mud to protect nationals in a
anything simenter.
foreign territory has in the
past bun und as an excuse for intervention of I hope the
Chiren are not attempting to build up a case for indimention in H. Kung. Time will show but we shd watch this aspect.
? As in aft.
Mall
18/1
At the
moment
Page 6
ask for
This
Beems
15he alocal
WL
need I have
incident and I do not think
The can. Peneral! Cy82
"amendments the draft
P.C. Terrom. 18/1/52
suggested some.
Page 7μr. Faskin.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.