Page 250
247
The
their introduction and the Second Reading
negotiations which were proceeding with the Local
Authorities showed that they would probably unite
in asking for further financial assistance and
that they would offer no insuperable opposition to
the Poor Law provisions. But, in his opinion, it
would be most undesirable to proceed with Part I
of the Bill and allow the General Election to
intervene before the passing of the remainder of
the Pill.
In the course of the discussion which followed,
various opinions were expressed on the advantages
and disadvantages of having an Election at dates
falling between May and October.
The Cabinet were reminded of the importance
of passing the following Bills, among others,
before Easter:-
LAND PURCHASE BILL (NORTHERN IRELAND) UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (NORTHERN IRELAND) EXPORT CREDITS BILL
INDIAN HIGH COURTS BILL.
The Cabinet agreed
(a) That the Parliamentary Secretary to
the Treasury should circulate to the Cabinet his views on the most advan- tageous period between May and October, 1929, inclusive, for holding the General Election.
(b) That the Prime Minister should obtain the views of the Unionist Central Office on the same question.
(e) That the Chancellor of the Exchequer
should circulate the views of the Treasury on the consequences of delaying the Budget pending the holding of a General Election early in the
Summer.
(d) That the programme of Government
Business should be further considered at the next Meeting of the Cabinet.
Page 250
Page 250
Page 250
Page 250Page 251
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.