CAB129-45 — Page 11

1079

11

Page 11

make a significant contribution to the strengthering of joint plans for global

strategy and for the defence of the Middle East, which I know from our

recent talks in London is so much in your mind. In view of what I say

below, therefore, let there be no mistake that we are fully behind you in

your desire for a defence guarantee from the United States.

At the same time, the Cabinet here feel that we should not embark

on this new venture without the most careful consideration of the reper-

cussions which a Treaty on the lines of the present draft is likely to have:

a Treaty of this kind is bound to have an effect on strategy, on international

affairs and on Commonwealth relations,

The Cabinet still have some real anxieties about the draft in its

present forin and the Prime Minister has authorised me to put our worries

frankly to you so that we can consider together what best can be done about

them.

A regional defence system, extending to South-East Asia and the

Indian sub-continent and including the islands of the East Indies and the

Pacific has always been for us a most desirable long-term objective as

completing the world-wide defence chain of which the North Atlantic Treaty

was the first link. We are concerned lest a Treaty setting up a defence

council limited to Australia, New Zealand and the United States might set

back rather than assist the ultimate achievement of this major objective.

The inclusion of the Philippines would make matters even worse from this

point of view.

We also fear that a Treaty in the form as now drafted would have

unfortunate political repercussions in the United Kingdom, and perhaps

also in other parts of the Commonwealth.

It does seem to us that there

is a very real danger that, in view of the United Kingdom's essential

interest in the Pacific, arising from her Commonwealth connections as

Page 11

Page 11 well as her territorial possessions there, such a Treaty might be read as

-5--

12