1971-06-08 — Page 15

頁三第張四第日六十月五年亥辛歷夏

WAH KIU YAT PO

郭日僑華

中中會考地理(卷一)解答一潘桂成一

本公甲乙兩部。考生必須卷甲部第一題,並選答乙部任何選)全卷共感理。二

A、瀾中主流之流内网同晢生理手拉列

老主先於甲已亥流間之長度,在圖上得无公分,故際度在1:25000之比 二例只鸭上既

9x250x2250公尺。

蘇图中號路之破牢地形及河川之關係。試舉案例以传明之。(大分)

地形較低,所以必須GH CEMBANKMENT)

·同時撒路也因為三個小阿谷,所以必須建設,其能將海邊之用盘。

易於避張萬六仁限,也可禁少水液之求。同時把方乘接一大之河谷平底包 現無地,此乃网极客內居民之求償,且丙地向康时容易能也

以網直比例半分代寄下一公尺,於所附之方格上CAB減作一剖面,並於彌中指出 河流之正確位置。(大分)

乙部 區域地理 2

CCIA、泰國之自然分開,可分作方区的

樂出此等分區之界後,並於至右下

答:如附阙。

、胶淡泰國與碼句於地形上相似之,(九))

公

天之分割面啊,在泰國任东北高原,而在應包括北高原,但認明幙地被同流分划晶

泰國和緬甸次中部称易大词迪望平原,在影你有沙能平原而在極句帮伊洛瓦底江谷

但山坡大部被森林覆盖

·西南風所虛饮和供,也有强烈的理才而除

佩國東北部各有一瑟希地,在泰國轉運功高原面緬甸當排高原也,兩地地勢俱在一 千公尺以下,大致皂波狀與面。

二期星日八月六年一七九一厩公年十六國民華中育教僑章

|||

莓

大專組入選佳作

【華僑日報報慶徵文

學生運動面面觀

高謙文

對此會馬各方面的事情關心,這正基香港學生遇 「及酒步的一面,社會頭論方面,則分至正瓦兩法,可以忘記香箍韓族發境,野心家時常在勞與 正面的意見長盃些課及示威行對於出香港,他們無時無刻不是在煽動,在撥火,但面上

故此任何對靠政治意的羣衆示威行斯此憑她於迷途之學生。 岣社衲人巧尅些行動是可能受到帕特价子國 上已詞季再世,故此給予些「野心家」及「做 風良好的傳統,不宣作出任何過激之行也。更有山已氣装入這些郛陷櫫了,而亦有很多社會人 不安的管,韩應該體截,同冰船;安兆基創翊誤的文章,證明」再心家」及「政治眼予人 徐悲死,安定得大前留,任何足以引,他肏始剪一幅較性的,有政治宣傳的,有村滅一引導我們思 野心家之利用,昨無一經與社會對的開極力量 治汉子∫果論上,闫涵擊,同時尖喚醒了一些降的一 一步的拔河。而反方面則似燧依何終佔器應以此我有觀際牌發覺在一些大姊性生的刋物中,有人

香港演出洲斯已經開始了,然而學生運動,安白有一重大的資示,在政府方面來說,不斷 | 产府當局及社會人士對「學生越山的發展

「再生已不是只識「死」的圴了..而是開始他就是我的人

当时因有北評政府的古画稿去越南學生運動的發展,

近年來監及日本作各地舉附越起,未來

·《包括任何形式的,因此他一的文法定運化等。社神人士若對學生運動全不减 從線,還行,西至和尚安人鼓大打出手,熟度在在的火照顧,讓我們韾香融美及日本的學生運 學生們去平行運生運動,因与良好。莛當之學生 當他們的口號於反戰爭,反封球,回頭聰 黑動易建設性的,對就會有一定之改革作用, 政府應落手研究生運動,從而發搬去指導

「五他翼動」了“在民國八年五月四日,北京太 学。 對,但對現代達有影响的學生運動,他耍首推特風創,而是一種發洩科内或甚至顯搜政府的一座科其改革社會的目的。就 发布空道原之「公事上播 六黨學生運動之積極正治县寬,追撥長亂的行動,實在不想真正的单,從而他學生運動在上當反理智的造徑下这行,而 但這種問神對後世學生運動影刑至六,晚清詩一力及反陰府之英現,隱屢和警方人员發生打鬥,如人士對於適當之學生進到以顯號方協助及證導, 實上花運動在中國來說,已有很畫的歷史。「解放」,設食迷幻类,追求真正的人生,他問道一心,而抱成「各案自油門前雪,不現他人瓦上 南宋時陳東以就學生運動,本就不是一種啟迪的去現,而是「」的態度,崔基完全縶似的,因鸟學中满勤就和 ņ後逖协以考勤 |栩断敗的,極向液素的行動。此外他們粥頰澡一松社會演動,對社會有一宗之影响,故此社會

上沾粉,對現在還有塑造的影响。

做人要的學民國獨有的們不可告入的台的。螞鸞上,在密法迅一個由 守自己的立場;請記您,眞正而有谳義之學生運

布核回顧坐着说酽衪這兩三年來的丛生翼一生了,無相讓他們把持為利用查際的學生,」力的,但同學們;花氣候,經做店妝好及冷泰的 王產生領導北京各松终生舉行愛國運動,得字塔,故此在比對之下,香港之巫生置動已影|旗及小心,學生們所换取的不是穷目的,而 幹之表證明應,而後來更由政治選動流榭妈文化,智慧很和平的了,但我們决不能讓江何「麥心份,公正的言論,合理及知平的行斯。等刻反理智的。 法「源性堡湖」,南坐不必要之騷亂,此泡到他一所面對鴴理,对任何耳動於捕忍不旃酒會, 【苧]我治賍予已把這些純潔目的學生運動的態度。此外,這種運動,遇到很藍和羅

[行剿官與其可以對任何不合的琬加

去,於恐將史寫下光獨之一頁, 加过智態度來改造就會的行動。最後,你視習

·有所史以送的猛烈抨呢,被幸的學生及一部份教和平的手洪去探器去表達已的意見,但我們不

星的质料查,或苦於「何政府制您不滿,你大可用一之際生𨧀動水染源整響?正當的涂阿發展下

[濟的關饼。一年後,趾一九七八年四月二十二日 中交大學三間成性學院的學生部,念了抗晒大 開給學生的影的抗器,引起了社裡人士 上A 的批評,而採取關際運站,因在漩生了被 一體缐艾有一間著名的私立其上學院,因受到學生 想之自由。因而性怒了社餅人士及到府當局。 ,大學行政有若沙府機關,郎給黨表

T祧酇侯推行它對玼會的責任,且

中文大學學主會獾稿

中文大學科系選擇指導

因此, 英國語文學系

LEYEN KATEE (11) •

訪問艾薇敦博士(DR-A R. 取應小的,莎士比亞。

科目套音樂、造句法、翻譯、拉丁文,應 ,除上浦主儁科目外,不发及生並得邊假若干 熬四年花下自於少選二科·小說、

為了適應家拙此的仿求,中文大學的英.

師同之服貼度,乖行了一天府坐,懂來實在」

B.ETHERTON)

月經的語製學系在最近的數年來作了一個很電的,除了中文大學入學費

戴本上在國的畷試,可到只選一庭,網雜儉大入學試普希涅度英交合格,或英文

第二十一人被治安人说術 款。木博古斯學乖梵語文的遠方,門就賴文大學英國新教學來治·特的馬,本系並不感只聯英艾中葉的學生,對李

成為北、英文之無力。同時,建设新村大部分能唼致質而出,成母優異步的,因此有志

傑的米而車。好的英語業礎。 服務。有些則在此際營運任職。北航紅工商業 分門,以柔資料顯示,在很多平常坐在教育

TRU-SPF RIBERSEKER

[ 黑 所代蹻匠的髙誌,而臨永昌他們

在生態示

門國東南部各有一小丘陵嘞,泰國烤苡莲山市缅甸倫罷古山也,高寒管五百公尺以下

同各有一狭長之地熱帶有伸入馬來半島,而進入熱帶魚

地落爲起伏

然屮早都市之名額並股清垃圾職

宇都市宝熊谷BANGKOK 、百物,也报大城,位河口內叫千公里,有儀器: 分別至东北鄰區、叻和高原、 商丘時和南地块綜各地

間也是東南諒之航空中心,故有重要的商場體,造成百分之 完成,借工美不多,僅有化品工業和强木加工概和老书而已。 (三)A、日本在土地利用方面草地及牧地佔面能減少(带土地利亞總而饮3.8%)試防点

之剥外转易在此

但關術說,名古惡平原所應不應。但如經产地却全部现代

若動,所以只有山間小鞏地或山湖之小河谷平原被除套欢帮地和坎地 ,終述日本的地之分离地形之關係。(六分)

鹽類

分布之需要排件,日本之耕地絕大部分分布於三大平安,即關東平底、名言中原、

雙江山間小

會有新地也。尤!!)

説明日本地不足而人口现的频是方之半店。(

在日本辧取不足而人口提名,但日本之船所方法和

自營式學選CINTE

NSIVE SUBSISTANCE FARMING),尤其中平常狀況必然破展出,向一船家所

北方高原

心琢南血隅

日本 耕地分布

英中會考歷史科答案(續)

SUGGESTED. ANSWERS TO HK, CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION®

EXAMINATION (ENGLISH) 1971. History (Continued)

B.1 How did Napoleon III's foreign policy help to cause his

-downfall?

In October, 1852, Louis Napoleon said to the public, "The Empire is peace." However, he failed to adhere to this policy. He soon embarked on an adventurous foreign policy which eventual: ly cost him his Lupire. In drsuing an adventurous foreign pow. Iicy, Louis Napoleon aucomatically involved France in "foreign wars. But why should France ask for foreign adventure? It was because the French people wanted glory But glory had to be paid. for by wars. And wars disrupted peace. Louis Napoleon was - brought: dawn simply Because of the fact that peace and glory: were incompatible. le wiiTed glory and sacrificed peace, "When "French glory was destoryed through defeat in a foreign war.

(Franco-Prussian War), and' with French peace:being disrupted by the War, Louis Napoleon had to go.

The Crimean War began Napoleon III's adventures abroad. It was a war in which neither side won. In fact it has always been called. an "unnecessary Hari, On the behalf of Frances the war was fought almost for no obvious reasons, other than for the magic word of Glory. Napoleon III must have joined the var be- cause of his lust for glory which was also shared by the or- dinary Frenchman. All went well as far as French losses of life on battlefield reached France, the Frenchmen hoped for peace. It was this incompatibility between glory and peace that later was to destroy Louis Napoleon's regime.

His adventure in the Italian game of national unification vas 3 semi-success. The first round of the game satisfied every Frenchman, French assistance to the Italian nationalist move- ment gave the Frenchmen, a sense of glory. They felt themselves the Liberator of the subject peoples, They looked upon them- selves as the champion of all nationalist movements. The French=" Italian allied military success at Magenta and Solferino fill- ed every Frenchman's heart with Just and pride, But the second : round of the game vas enough to. offset the initial gains in. prestige. Napoleon's sudden withdrawal from the Italian na- tionalist cause (signing of the Peace of Villafranca) dis illusioned many a Frenchman, They regarded Napoleon III's decision as a sign of betrayal。They thought that. Napoleon oy doing so betrayed French glory and betrayed the Italians. Na- | poleonis blackening of French prestige was unpardonable..

Another venture that contributed to the decline of his popularity and prestige was his Mexican expedition. The with.. drawal: of French, troops from iexico in 1807; which led to the Maximilian tragedy, discredited France on an international level. The ill-fated Mexican adventure gave still another blow to the emperor's prestige

Then there was the Prussian problem and the German nat tionalist movement. As France was a continental powers she could not be unaffected by German affairs. But the position, response and policies that Louis Napoleon's Government adopted were so unwitting that France was to suffer diplomatic defeats unprec”- dented in its history. And to crown such failures, Napoleon III plunged France into humiliating military defeat. First, there was the issue of claiming territorial compensation. from Pruse/ sia, Whether Napoléon. III's claim was. justified or not (he claimed compensation for having remained neutral in the Austro- "Pruesia War), the fact was that France made herself a fool, Nan poleon III's territorial ambitions were made knowm to every Equ ropean state, through the skilful diplomacy of Bismarck, Nan poleon's appetite on the Rhineland, the Luxembourg and Belgium was revealed to all, And France was naturally discredited... 'Then Louis Napoleon unwittingly entangled France in the Spanish throne might fall into a Hohenzollern, Napoleon III、une wittingly urged the Kaiser to give a pledge to the liohenzollern candidate's withdrawal. In fact, it was as much as Napoleon III'a mistake as it was. Ambassador "Benedetti's. Benedetti's hard press- ing on the Kaiser's pledge was diplomatically stupid. It gave Bismarck his opportunity to create a casus belli to fight France, It was the Ems Telegram. And France was anain outwitted. It was diplomatic defeat."

...... Then. Louis Napoleon made the fatal mistake with the prestige of his Empire damaged several times in diplomatic defeats, Louis Napoleon Finally hoped to restore his last prestige by making a 'gumble on war. He fought Prussia, It proved a disaster. for his Empire and for France. The situation was simple. French pre....... stige had been damaged, His.regime might have survived. if jie had given France peace, But he didn't. He plunged France into national war. Peace was destroyed. Glory had been lost and was to be lost again in the Franco-Prussian War, he could no longer give the French people anything. He had to go.

Louis Napoleon had come to power by promising "Peace and Glory to France, He would retain his.position as Iong, as the French were fed with peace and glory. However his foreign po licy could not be all the time successful. Once he suffered dipo- matic defeat, he had to restore it. He could do it only by risk- ng war. And war disrupted peace. Unfortunately defeat deprived

hfw of both peace

be lost the two..

How did the

Most

he had to

character and policy of Ezar Nicholas IT cone

tribute to the decline and overthrow of the Czarist non jarichy?

Trotsky has said, "Nicholas II inherited from his an cestors not only a giant empire, but a revolution. "Whether Trotsky's deteministic judgement of history is correct or not, the fact is that Cyarist autocracy ended with Nicholas II, How- even one cannot safety say that Nicholas II was totally reapone sible for bringing down the Czarist monarchy just because he was the last Czar. It would be more correct. to say that the underlying unrest in Russia had been there before. Nicholas) came to the throne, and Nicholas! responibility was that he did

·not do anythipg to alleviate auch unrest, Instead, he responded by repression. And repression only hardened the enemies of the autocracy. In the: end, the autocracy. was overthroom,

The Russian peasantry had always been discontented, The Emancipation in Alemander II's reign didn't improve the con- ditions of the Russian peasants. And by the time of Nicholas IT, the mass of the pedsantry was even poorer, for the increase of the rural population was forcing down the size of land- holdings, while the communal tenure of the mire made agricultural "progress impossible Collective ownership of land in the mir only

made the peasants discontented. Nicholas II's Government, as any other predecessor Cyarist government, could do nothing abou "it. But while there had been no revolutionaries promising the peasants land before, there were such revolutionaries by the time of Nicholas II. These revolutionaries presented themselves as the contender of power against the autocracy. They increasing ly claimed the allegiance of the landhungry peasants who later helped in the overthrow of the autocracy,

Being an autocrat, Nicholas II naturally frowned upon the liberal zemstvo. When the liberal zemstvo representatives de manded zemstro participation in government and an increase in zemstvo powers, Nicholas II alienated them by calling their schemes as "senseless dreams." By so doing, Nicholas II de- prived his autocracy of its last possible ally.

Lacking in initiative and in deep thought, Nicholas 11 could not possibly formulate any new policy which was 、 departure from his father's. He could only follow what his father had done. Consequently his character and outlook, which was reactionary, determind his policies. He could only think of a reactionary rule, with its secret police, ter- roirs, and repression. His regin saw a tremendous increase in industrial strikes. To answer to these strikes, there were further repression. And these black reaftion and re- pression only antagonized the revolutionaries, workers, pea- sants and vall. The price was the overthrow of his monarchy.

The 1905 Revolution might have taught a lesson to the Czar if he had been conscious and alert. He could even have. saved his autocracy in 1917 had he been able to keep to his promises in the 1905 October Manifesto, The monarchy might have survived if Nicholas TI had worked: seriously and honestm ly on the Duma. Unfortunately, he didn't. First, he did not+ like the idea of a Duma at all since he was brought up as an 'autocrat reactionary in; outlook Secondy the Dumas were dissolv wed at his:

mercy one after another. Third, the Dumas were given tao little power that most Russians dismissed' the Dumas as puppets, Certainly if Nicholas II had given wider powers to the Dumas and to the local "zemsteos, the autocracy. could have: won back the support of most Russians, And if inudstrial legistation had been enacted more benevolently and more energetically, the autocracy could even have won back the increasing workers from the hands of the revalutionaries. ▼

Then there was the Czar's fatal policy of fighting in the First World War, For one thing, the Russians waited peace" and their bread, not a war. This was his mistake number one, And by plunging Russia in a full-fleged war, Nicholas made three other mistakes. First, he plunged Russia into a wartime ade ministrative chaos, thus giving the revolutionaries a free hand in their attack on the regime. Second, he dislocated Russia's.- fragile; economy by joining the war. The peasants and the masses suffered. Food became more scarce. Prices soared. Fuel was Lacking. All these miseries embittered 'the; masses and, they could only join the revolutionaries, Third, the Har bred discontent among the troops, Soldiers; defected and left. The last pillar of the autocaracy. the army, was no longer loyal, And this was fatal.

"In conclusion, one may say that the unrest for undoing the Czariat monarchy had been there before Nicholas II. And" It was Nicholas who suffered from it because he did not da anything to alleviate, the unrest, Then there were other: mistakes that Nicholas II made, such as the fatal decision of joining the World War, which was solely Nicholas' responsibility. When these mereadded together, they widid the autocracy,

Page 15Page 16