HONG KONG URBAN COUNCIL
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: Mr. Chairman, is Mr. SALES seriously suggesting that eventually this Council should consider charging for advertisements?
MR. SALES: Mr. Chairman, there is no reason why Government should not charge for advertisements. There is no reason why commercial advantage should be taken of our roads, streets and buildings without the public coffers benefitting as a result.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: Mr. Chairman, may I ask the Chairman of the Urban Amenities Select Committee, through you, whether he can give any approximate indication as to when these By-laws will be completed, because, as he has mentioned, it has been many years since the draft was revised and revised several times over?
MR. SALES: Mr. Chairman, I used the term "a few years" not "many years".
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: I still have not had my first supplementary question answered, that is, that the existing By-laws are very much out of date. Are they, Mr. Chairman?
MR. SALES: Mr. Chairman, the By-laws have been revised because they are out of date. If they were not out of date there would have been no need for revision.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: Mr. Chairman, the proposed Advertisement By-laws are under revision. They have not yet been passed by this Council.
MR. SALES: Mr. Chairman, may I suggest that a copy of the draft By-laws as revised and still under consideration for the last time, be submitted to Mr. CHEONG-LEEN, since it has been my experience that whenever I have invited him to attend a meeting of the Urban Amenities Select Committee, he has hardly ever taken advantage of it because of the early hour.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: Mr. Chairman, Mr. SALES says he has not invited me because of the time. I am still awaiting his next invitation.
MR. SALES: The invitation is extended through you, Mr. Chairman.
MR. WATSON: Mr. Chairman, may I ask a supplementary on this question? Does the Department consider that it now has sufficient powers to remove offending advertisements, particularly in rural districts?
HONG KONG URBAN COUNCIL
MR. SALES: The Department has done so, Mr. Chairman, in respect of a complaint put forward jointly by Mr. WATSON and Mr. MARDEN, because of offensive advertisements appearing within their respective or joint constituency. (Laughter).
MR. WATSON: I will just say that they are still appearing. (Laughter).
MR. H. CHEONG-LEEN asked the following question:
In addition to the regular year-round public health and cleansing campaigns of this Council, will the Director of Urban Services be prepared to organize (as an effective exercise in civic education) a KEEP YOUR CITY CLEAN WEEK some time in the second half of the year, in which Kaifong Associations and other interested groups will seek maximum public co-operation to keep our streets as free as possible from rubbish and litter during this KEEP YOUR CITY CLEAN WEEK?
THE CHAIRMAN replied as follows:
I understand that the Health Education Select Committee has already agreed on a programme of Health Education Campaigns for 1964/65, and I ask the Chairman of the Committee to reply to this specific question.
DR. P. F. Woo, CHAIRMAN OF THE HEALTH EDUCATION SELECT COMMITTEE, replied as follows:
The Health Education Select Committee has recently approved a programme of publicity campaigns for this year which includes a "Keep Your City Clean" campaign in September or October. Details of this campaign have not yet been worked out but I agree that if the campaign is to be effective it must be intensive and my Committee will examine your suggestion that it should be concentrated into a single week.
Kaifong Associations and other interested bodies will certainly be invited to co-operate and I am sure that they will give their assistance gladly as they have done in the past.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: May I say, in clarification, that this reply by the Chairman of the Health Education Select Committee was not organized by the Elected Members. It was organized either by the chair or the Department.
Page 180 of 194
of 194
Page 179 of 194
340
HONG KONG URBAN COUNCIL
MR. CHEONG-LEEN: Mr. Chairman, is Mr. SALES seriously suggesting that eventually this Council should consider charging for advertisements?
MR. SALES: Mr. Chairman, there is no reason why Government should not charge for advertisements. There is no reason why com- mercial advantage should be taken of our roads, streets and buildings without the public coffers benefitting as a result.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN:-Mr. Chairman, may I ask the Chairman of the Urban Amenities Select Committee, through you, whether he can give any approximate indication as to when these By-laws will be com- pleted, because, as he has mentioned, it has been many years since the draft was revised and revised several times over?
MR. SALES-Mr. Chairman, I used the term "a few years" not "many years".
MR. CHEONG-LEEN:-I still have not had my first supplementary question answered, that is, that the existing By-laws are very much out of date. Are they, Mr. Chairman?
MR. SALES: -Mr. Chairman, the By-laws have been revised because they are out of date. If they were not out of date there would have been no need for revision.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN:-Mr. Chairman, the proposed Advertisement By-laws are under revision. They have not yet been passed by this Council.
MR. SALES: Mr. Chairman, may I suggest that a copy of the draft By-laws as revised and still under consideration for the last time, be submitted to Mr. CHEONG-LEEN, since it has been my experience that whenever I have invited him to attend a meeting of the Urban Amenities Select Committee, he has hardly ever taken advantage of it because of the early hour.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN:-Mr. Chairman, Mr. SALES says he has not invited me because of the time. I am still awaiting his next invitation.
MR. SALES: The invitation is extended through you, Mr. Chair-
man.
MR. WATSON:-Mr. Chairman, may I ask a supplementary on this question? Does the Department consider that it now has sufficient powers to remove offending advertisements, particularly in rural dis- tricts?
HONG KONG URBAN COUNCIL
341
MR. SALES: The Department has done so, Mr. Chairman, in respect of a complaint put forward jointly by Mr. WATSON and Mr. MARDEN, because of offensive advertisements appearing within their res- pective or joint constituency. (Laughter).
MR. WATSON-I will just say that they are still appearing. (Laughter).
MR. H. CHEONG-LEEN asked the following question :-
In addition to the regular year-round public health and cleans- ing campaigns of this Council, will the Director of Urban Services be prepared to organize (as an effective exercise in civic education) a KEEP YOUR CITY CLEAN WEEK some time in the second half of the year, in which Kaifong Associations and other interested groups will seek maxi- mum public co-operation to keep our streets as free as possible from rubbish and litter during this KEEP YOUR CITY CLEAN WEEK?
THE CHAIRMAN replied as follows:-
I understand that the Health Education Select Committee has already agreed on a programme of Health Education Cam- paigns for 1964/65, and I ask the Chairman of the Com- mittee to reply to this specific question.
DR. P. F. Woo, CHAIRMAN OF THE HEALTH EDUCATION SELECT COMMITTEE, replied as follows:
The Health Education Select Committee has recently approved a programme of publicity campaigns for this year which includes a "Keep Your City Clean" campaign in Septem- ber or October. Details of this campaign have not yet been worked out but I agree that if the campaign is to be effective it must be intensive and my Committee will examine your suggestion that it should be concentrated into a single week.
Kaifong Associations and other interested bodies will certainly be invited to co-operate and I am sure that they will give their assistance gladly as they have done in the past.
MR. CHEONG-LEEN:-May I say, in clarification, that this reply by the Chairman of the Health Education Select Committee was not organized by the Elected Members. It was organized either by the chair or the Department.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.