THE WOOD MURDER CASE
Appeal Against Against Convictions
Rejected
The Full Court of Appeal, comprising Mr Justice Gould (acting Chief Justice) and Mr Justice Reynolds (acting Puisne Judge) this morning in a written judgment refused the appeal by Lau Hoi alias Lau Yung-hoi, and Ho Cheuk-kul against their conviction and death sentence for the murder of Lytton Bevis Wood on February 11.
THE HONGKONG TELEGRAPH, THURSDAY, JULY 22, 1948.
ONLY
Choosing The Man
Right Sort
And
Accused Of Rape TODAY KING'S Intent To Assault
AIR-CONDITIONED
Of Husband
to
July 21-Advice London, schoolgirls on how to choose, catch and keep husbands was given by Mr H. Watney Master, Chairman and Governor of St Paul's School for Girls, when he attended the annual school prize-giving at Hammersmith yesterday.
Io sald: "Don't be too forward
Allegations of rape and 'assault with Intent to rob 22. were made by the Crown against Chung-Yim-hung, unemployed, when his trial opened before Mr Justico" Reynolds (Acting Pulano Judge) at the Criminal Sessions this morning.
Chung was charged with having carnal knowledge of Poon Ng-mui, 22, on May 10, without her consent; and with assault, whilst being
or too backward. Avold the book-armed, with intent to rob," worm, who will be more interested. Mr Blair-Kerr (Assistant Crown in his studies, avold the boy with Solicitor) assisted by Det.. Insp the parted hair and the lovely pro- Matches, prosecuted. Accused was Allo who will always be asked to not legally represented.
and parties by your girl friends, nvold the ultra heavy sporting type, who will make you a golf, cricket or beer widow.
The Jury empanelled Included two women members.
Storm In
A Teacup
Mr Blair-Kerr told the Jury that Woman Acquitted On
Bus Fare Charge
"Choose a man in a steady job, the victim of this alleged rape and oven a Government civil servant robbery with intent to rob was Mr D. A. L. Wright (instructed appollant then went into the wit-they can be quite human at home.young woman named Poon Ng-mul," An old fashion taxi is still a aged 22. At the moment, he said, by Mr P. J. Griffitha) was for tho nens box and gave his story to the appellants and Mr A. Lonsdale Judge, who, for this purpose, was good place to get the chosen male she called herself the kept woman (acting Solicitor-General)
the tribunal of fact as well as law, into a situation where he will ask of an Indian in Ma Tau Chung Crown.
having to decide whether or not this to marry you, but, if in doubt, ask Camp, Kowloon City, and she also had admitted in evidence in the was a voluntary statement. Last-Mother.
lower Court that prior to this she
for
the
ly it is clear that, once a statement has been admitted, the question of
con-
1. that certain statements of the proper the same evidence to enable
accused were wrongly admitted ira evidence by the trial judge.
2. that there, was four and non-direction of the jury on cerning their allegations of having been beaten and Ill-treated while In police hands.
RELEVANT FACTS
The only facts which are relevant
cach
"How to treat him when you've
Bruto' wtl1
PROFESSIONAL
treated and beaten by the police and where the ruling by then only smokers had
made his statement as a result ofave been made on the basis that estreated.
the sintement is admissible such ill-treatment and in fear of y
rejected the
the evidence of further beating. The evidence of the
treatment or
or inducement, or
CARRIER
was a prostitute.
WAS
tho
to
0
PIERRE
鹪 Describing the case storm in a teacup raised by bad tempers on both sides, Mr Hin- shing Lo at Central this morning acquitted Mrs E. M. da Roza of evading payment of bus fare, holding that the ac cused never meant to defraud tho China Motor Bus Company of 80.cents.
Ng Sum, bus conductor, said that two days before the Incident of the chargo, Mrs Roza had caused him great inconvenience. Travelling to
first appellant is rather confused but any such clrcumstances had existed | Chan Kit, 29, unemployed, wos fined she did not. Accused then asked Poon door for a
The text of the judgment follows: The two appellants in this case anked leave to appeal against their convictions for, the murder of Lytton the weight which is to be given to got him? Feed the holds good."-Reuter.
NO DISTINCTION Bevis Wood on the 11th day of it is one for the jury, February, 1948. Their applications There is no doubt that, in many
"The law draws no distinction were treated as appeals and counsel casen, where the judge has
whatever between any classes of the for both appellants based his argu-sidered the evidence and decided
statement
community, particularly as regards is admisalble follow- that ment on the two grounds
a charge of rape," Mr Blair-Kerr de- having been made voluntarily, It is ing:
clared. "Prostitutes are entitled to for the Jury to hear
and OPIUM
protection of the law in just as full | them to determine the
the weight to be
a manner as the most moral persons Queen Mary, Hospital from the attached to the statement. For "You are a professional carrier,"
amongst us."
ferry, she gave him a $5 note. Just example, the judge might have enld Mr d'Almada
at Central this
change found that there was an inducement morning when he sentenced Lau
Continuing, the Assistant Crowns he returned her $4.70
and a ticket, she produced 30 cents unemployed, to Solleitor said that about 8 p.m. on from her handbag and tendered that, by a person in authority but that it Kam-chuen, 22, was based on spiritual grounds only; four months and recommended him May 10. Foon was waiting for her when he returned her $5 note, sho
Wong the statement would not thereby be for banishment for possession of Indian boy friend In Sung
seemed to be reluctant to take it carrying Tol Road. Sho wan rendered inadmissible. Or again, one and a half taels of raw oplum
and ho had to place It on ber hand- a gramophone which she
bag. This annoyed him as he was return to him to the grounds of appeal are that the there might be persuasion or in- at Ping On Wharf yesterday.
going to ducement by
She very busy attending to other passen- person not in a posi-
half appellants while in pollee custody tion of authority which similarly
Defendant said he was a travel-waited for about two and made and signed statements which would not exclude the statement. ling trader and someone asked him hours but her boy friend did not gers, and it seemed that she did it were
put in evidenco and formed in each of those cases it would Le to carry the oplum achore.
arrive. Feeling restive, Poon walked purposely.
REFUSED TO PAY vital parts of the Crown's
the case proper for the jury to consider A fine of $900 or six months was round Sung Wong Tol Road to the against
accused. Each of the wh
whala evidence
On July 18, Mrs Roza boarded the appellants alleged that be was in weight. idence on the question of imposed on Chan Chlu, 27, for keep-Camp to look for him. When about
position ing an opium, divan at 108
floor. Six whom she later up, a man, bus at Queen Mary Hospital for
Des 60 yards from the that
Vooux Road West, first
their $30 ball each accused, came up from behind her, town, the conductor went on to say. caught hold of her arm, produced a By the time he reached her to ask for the fare the bus was near the revolver
threatened her and For keeping a divan at un w that
if numbered hut in Jardine Street, keep quiet or he would shoot her if cemetery and he had to open the
the After not operate in the mind of $750 or three months.
Defendant for her valuables and she said she the accused and the statement was had a Police record. Two smokers did not have any. He then searched giving the signal for the voluntary notwithstanding them?
her and found two keys which she proceed, he asked Mrs Roza for the were each fined $30.
fare, but she refused, saying that GENERAL PROPOSITION
ald were keys of the house. this time he saw a watch on her he had trod on her shoes and solled No authority directly Jearned
this 00
It was quite possible that trial judgo but, though it was at point was quoted by counsel.,
wrist and asked her to take it of them, The
he did so as the bus was crowded, above
She refused. first proposed to send the Jury away general proposition as
but he told her that that was on- while it was taken, counsel for the forth is that admissibility is for the
"Accused then asked Poon whe-other matter and she must pay her defence requested that they be per-judge and weight for the jury. But
ther she was married," Mr Blair- faro She replied that she would mitted to remain and they finally where the judge's anding on the
Kerr went on, "and Poon said Yes. wait for the bus inspector to arrive, did so.
Having beard the evidence facts
admissibility regulating
of Alfredo Augusto Custejo of 14 He then asked whether she would for she knew many of the Inspec
She refused him three times accused that certain things hap- appellants, the learned trial judge the
she remained silent. Ac- to pay the fare and as no inspector rejected the allegations of the nepened or is a finding that though d'Almada at Central this morning at this
came on board he took her to the cused, ruled that the statements such things happened they had no for driving car No. 1487 without duccused continued to ask her pro-
Police Station. were voluntarily made and accord-effect on the mind of the accused care and attention at Upper Albert mising not to
to take ony properly from
A student, Choi Tin-wel, gave ingly admitted them In ovidence, when making the statement, in it Road
her if she consented, and also to say May 31.
Police said
out it. To this she finally corroborative evidence, saying that i In his summing up he referred to proper for the jury again to con-
Inspector Ferrier
Mr Blair-Kerr reminded he heard the two quarrelling and the matter as follows-
sider that evidence on the question bus was going from cast to west "Dealing with the datements
of weight? made
If it is so, then it is when defendant cut into the path of the Jury that all this time accused that when the conductor asked the by the accused-I will refer to these open to the jury to hold that the the Police bus. The driver had to had this revolver in his hand which woman for the fare she said the important datements-limited the Judge was wrong and should never brake violently to avoid an accident. Poon said was pointed at her. On would wait for the inspector. You before I
A caution was administered to accused's instructions, Poon undress- statements to be read to you, certain have admitted the statement. They
in evidence was called. Before I admitted would
as Roberio Augustus, of the Hongkong ed, and the sexual relations took them, I had to be satisfied that they the
place. present be considering Electric Sub-Siation, Kennedy Town, were made freely and voluntarily, not
the same question as for driving without due care and under duress or not induced by threat
been before and decided by the attention at Morrison Hill Road on
There
arines hero
June 0. 110
he alleged that one of the papers
he signed was
only
the trial AL
the
blank evi-
they
passenger to board.
tho closing
door
and
bus to
as
of the
sheet. dence
this un bearing on the
admissibility statements, was heard by the
CAR DRIVERS" OFFENCES
At
on the paint, including that of the directly negailves the allegations Conduit Road, was fined $30 by Mr have sexual relations with him and tors.
or promien by somedan in authority. hay
I had to be satisfied that that was judge.
statements-to-be put-in-ae statements made by the various cured."
20-
п
such
on
su before I permitted it to be read. question of degree-it is not open Defendant was driving lorry No. I was so salised and permitted these to the defence to say there may 6010 with a Police vehicle travelling have been some fear in the minds of behind him. He suddenly turned the appellants which affected their right without warning. statements, but not of such nature "Now, when you are considering thes statements, you believe the accused to induce the judge to rule that
and a little later:-
becativo
As to the first ground of appeal.
judge, to be exercised in accordance
any
should hear the
a case,
INTRUDER APPEARS
the give
man
$1
as the
WDS
сола man who
her
of
the
for tho
DEFENDANT'S EVIDENCE Mrs Roza claimed that the ducior was a vindictive had falsely accused her, The in- cident of the $5 note took place about ten days before the present After a minute or so, they were disturbed by a third person, who incident. On July 18, the conductor shouted to them "Don't move. never approached her for the fare,
the Accused then got up and producing although she
money his revolver in turn told the intru-hand, She tendered the fare, but 100 der not to move. The other man, he did not collect it as he was
unarmed, then
She did stepped busy quarrelling with her. or if you think he may be telling the they were inadmissible as not being appears that the judge left it to the who was
forward. A discussion about "Lat soy she would wait for the inspector, truth when he tells you the statement voluntary. The conduct alleged on jury to say whether the statement he made is not correct on regarde his the part of the police was FO was true, which is not the same Sze" (Lucky Money) then followed but that was because she wanted to Pully because apart from these tato blameworthy that if the judge had as saying whether it was voluntary, and it was agreed that Poon should report the conductor before paying
second apart from the interjection
and certainly it was not be- part of it he must but
fare, ments, the evidence, consider, has accepted
Sze". After the money cause she wanted to evade payment. not reached the standard which will without
have ruled hesitation
quoted above the report is of Do
o the had been pald two constables The Magistrate said that, although entitle you to find Any
Assistance as it does not show the accused the statements were not voluntary guilty-far from it. 1, however, you
If counsel for reasons of the judge for admitting arrived, and on seeing them, accused he accopted the ovidence think the evidence of any accused and rejected thent. Just a pack of flos, then the previous the appellants is right, the judge the statement. Boyle v. Wiseman 11 was alleged to have flung away his conductor that he asked
He was, how fare and the woman refused to pay, statement made by him stands for your must direct the jury that he has Exch. 360 was a case in which the revolver and fled. consideration as an admission to be considered the allegations of the question was whether a certain ever, caught after a short chase and he believed that she had no frau- given auch weight as you think
the dulent intention to avoid payment, deserves having regard to the circum- accused and rejected them completo- document was an original or who- the party was then taken to
it
The weapon was but really wanted to make a com- made Lely, the
that has admitted
ther plaintiff could give secondary Police Station
later recovered.
plaint before she paid. She should the weight or value that you attachments in evidence as having been evidence of it. It was held that the to the statements. It depends on you.
madalatesst
of the free wills duty of the judge was to hear the You are to decide what value you
Mr Blair-Kerr said the revolver have paid and then made her com- evidence on both sides and decide which was fully
The conductor should have plaint. that never- should attack to these statements of the
loaded had boen theless they might on the mme the point and if he decided that the examined by an expert who found been less aggressive. It was unwise JUDGE'S DISCRETION
evidenco find him to have
to quarrel with anyone, but more been document produced was, an original
50 with a woman. wrong and that the statements were that it must be admitted and the had been cleaned since it
Hc acquitted Mrs Roza, but that the statements should not have induced or affected by fear. Surely secondary evidence excluded. Parke, last Bred.
such been admitted at
Summarising, Mr Blair-Kerr sald warned her not to quarrel again at all, it is only it is more reasonable that the direc- B. said (at p.363) "I witnesses that the Crown's case was that ac-and warned the conducior to be less necessary to say that the matter was tion should be that the statement is the
Length for the purpose of de- cused went there alone; he went aggressive with ladies in future. In the discretion of the learned trial before the jury as one made volunting whether the document ten-there with the intention to rob, he
ice tarlly,
ily and
that all. questions of
Mr D. J. Banfield, for the China with well defined legal principles. weight are for the jury but on that dered is the original; and if he is had a fully loaded revolver in his Motor Bus Company, pointed out It has not been shown that ho exer-basis-the jury should consider all of opinion that it is, that document possession which he threatened Poon the fact that the Company could cised his discretion wrongly or un- surrounding circumstances including alone must be read to the fury" and asked for her valuables. He not guarantee to have an inspector reasonably and in fact it is
the standard quite
of intelligence and It is not for a moment suggested searched her person and found only on board a bus on every trip and obvious that he directed his education of the person making it. that the jury might consider the a wrist watch. He balanced in his it would cause a lot of trouble if mind to the matters proper to be the actual contents, to what extent matter again as a question bearing mind the value of this watch with passengers refused to pay considered and decided the ques-corroboration is provided by other on the weight of the document and the pleasures of the body and at the inspector arrived. Lion upon evidence which
matter, but should disregard any fact not the original and deprive Jury the law on rape. There was
that it was in point of the gun chose the latter. his province to consider.
Mr Blair-Kers explained to the of weight accordingly. Tho Upon the second ground it is sub- allegation that it was not a volun-it
secondary evidence which the other no rape if the woman consented but mitted by counsel for appellants that tory statement.
however, party desires to submit is in his summing up the learned trial
DIFFERENT CASE
bo com such consent must
voluntary and of her own free will. Judge should have directed the jury
The type of ease mentioned earlier pletely excluded.
Trial is proceeding. that though he had admitted the in this judgment viz, where the in- statements in evidence as having ducement was only on spiritual been voluntarily made, they might grounds or made by a person not in
Court tot bait of the evidence
at US$5,000 and take a different view on that point and só gìvo much authority is distinguishable from the that it is open to the jury to take a
loss present in that the former involves
paroled him in the custody of his defence counsel, 'Abraham Unger. weight to the statements Counsel
later that Irving argued that fallure so to direct no resection by the judge of evi- which the judge has decided that thei
Unger said dence as to the fact of Inducement-
Potash, manager of the Furlers definito terms was a failure merely a finding that the Induce-
Joint Council, would surrender at to put
The
(Centinued from Pare 1)
10.20 R.M. Thursday (tomorrow). Ha. submitted further required the exclusion of the state the summing up under consideration.
Potash
New vacation in that the learned judge had insuffi- ment within the established rules of But the Court takes the view
The Grullists in the Assembly England. clently traversed the facts as to the law or practice. As has been the true principle is that where the 90 are against M. Maria because ho
The FBI agents who arrested Carl alleged ill-treatment and in one ins-pointed out, no such question of na- judge has heard evidence, either in hos taken a very critical line
Winter. Communist Party chairman tance on a point of fact bearing on ture or degree arises here where the the presence, or more properly in the General de Gaullo in public speeches in Michigan. In Detroit last night the same subject had mis-directed admission of the statement involves absence of the jury, and upon that
Outstanding personalities expected said they wore still hunting for the jury. These are only different complete rejection of the allega evidence decided that a statement to be invited to form part of M. Robert Thompson, chalyman of the aspects of the suma "matter.
tions. If counsel for the appellants was voluntarily made: In that Marlo's Cabinet, if he succeeds in 'ONUS ON CROWN It is well established that it is lows that every accused in the all the influence of ill-treatment or Paul Ramadler, the present Foreign chairman of the Communist Party in low met in his submission, it fol-was not made as a result or under forming one, include the ex-Fremter, New York State Communist Party Gilbert Green, Chicago' Communist der M. Schuman, the ex-Premier, M. district chairman, and Gus Hall, a matter for the judge to decide too frequent cases in which the threats, it is not proper for the
like allegations whether, nỹ statement made by "an | 11150,
are modo will be to consider again upon:
Minister micr,?
M. Georges Bidault, and Ohio-United Prets... matter person is admissible in entitled to have the admissibility of of weight the evidence as to the fact the
M. Paul Reynaud. * accused ovidenco or not ho decides that his statement fried twice, firstly, of such Il-treatment or threats, It was made because of threats, by tho Judge.
alone and then by the where the only conclusion which theAll these are reported to by Jury. This
posable
candidates for the Foreign violence, fear or Inducement by
Js not the view inken jury could come to which would be Ministry. The-present: Finance some porton in authority, he will by Hilbery: J. In R. Cowell 27 favourable to the accused is that the Minister, M. Bene Bayer, might be roject it. The onusB
C.A.R. the is on
Mantia, July 21 tropical de ill-treatment and threats or some called upon dos head how Ministry ortho (at Baga
to deal with the application of the Pression was reported today by the Local Weather Bureau to be deve- loping some 500 miles east of
Island. “M.“Mario” RESupporter southern
in
it was evidence and any
other
relevant come to a decisioni
TRUE PRINCIPLE
If the proper direction in law is different view of the evidence upon
statements have been voluntarily mado sufficiently clear to the
Jury in that
defence of the ment was not one of a nature which de, it may be that this was not:
was made, voluntarily and it that
ur
the
Jury
the
Coucounsel; port: therbot had in fact been exta-
Marie To Form
Cabinet
Crown to show affirmatively that it shut When enake was blished by the evidence, that the Marshall Plan in Franco, ed
the
at that the judge had been wrong
tro
bé
Indictment Of
US Communists
(Continued from Page 1)
18
on
TROPICAL
DEPRESSION
the
nt 10 miles
or not the legal principles applicable and of the barshall Plan, and was r that statement wasnterfected. "But" | admitting it in evidenca. Upon this sponsible for: the: Paid Holidnys | move; west-north-Waid, adding
the Bureau
MICHELE
At 2.30, 5.15,
7.20 & 9.30 p.m.
UNE PRODUCTION
LES FILMS GIBE
THREE INTERNATIONAL
PRIZES: AT THE
FESTIVAL OF CANNES
BLANCHAR
MORGAN
'LA SYMPHONIE PASTORALE"
ADAPTED FROM THE FAMOUS NOVEL OF ANDRE CIBE
DIALOGUE IN FRENCH-ENGLISH SUB-TITLES :
TO-MORROW
As “BOOMERANG!" Happened in Life!
So BOOMERANG! Comes to the Screen-
Real! True! Authentic!
Filmed the way it happened, "BOOMERANG)",
›`is a new kind of motion picture.
lifted, alive and planting.
out of life itselfi
Darryl, Zanuck
DANA ANDREWS
Boomerang
I
JANE WYATT LEE COBY
TO-DAY
ONLY
** CARA WILLIAMS » ARTHUR KENNEDY «GAİL LEYENÉ
TAYLOR HOLMEN - ROBERT KOTH-ED BEGLEY
Palced by
ELIA KAZAN-LOUIS de ROCHEMONT
Queen's
CONDITIONED
SEE THE BIG CLOCK.
The World's Most
Perfect Crime Piece.
Thún after you ve
suoni...don't. oll a soul about Junoth's rote:
RAY MILLAND CHARLES LAUGHTON
At 2.30, 5.15,
7.20.0 9.30
THE BIO CLOCK
Maureen O'Sullivan - George Macready Rita Johnson and Elsa Lancaster:
ADDED LATEST NEWS OF THE DAY -
Tito, the traitor? Food Planes Fly Over Berlin Blockado
Bathing Beauty Contest in Florida and Washington --- Etc!,
ORIENTAL
AIR CONDITIONED
- TAKE ANY EASTERN TRAM CAR OR HAPPY VALLEY BUS
SHOWING TO-DAY:.. 230-5,157.30-9.30
Alexander Korila presents
Vivien Leigh Ralph Richardson
with Kieron Moore,
· Tehtay's kesmertet fore uteri
ANNA KARENINA
· directed b) Julien Davirier. LONDON, FILA - PRODUCTION
onus is not tellscharged the state- wrong also in leaving to the statement was not voluntary within ment will not bo admitted.: 1121s | Jury. finally to any whether further the law. the function of the judge to do which Hübery. A elde the facts which will determine that want more than the appellant basis the summing up was more Bill paised in 1996 when he was por the queation of admissibility In was entitled to It gave him an favourable to the accused the
accused than it Under Secretary of State for that it couldnot yet determine
Next Change: "RELENTLESS" Foreign Affairs in M. Robert Bar whether it may develop into a Diat extra chance of escape. From the need have been. Pad, Humphraselor mei statement-of-facie in that casolt de The appeal is accordingly refund í raut's. Cabinet Routers wedokan
R. v. Hammond
hour
typhoon--Reuter..
In Technicolor
Page 5Page 6
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.