Sessional_Paper_1907 — Page 502

Sessional Papers 議政定例兩局文件 All

195 (242)

2413 4

particularly with regard to cubicles, and of course any views you have to express to us we will be very glad to hear them. As a matter of form, Mr. Ho, I must ask you who you

Your name is Ho Kom Tong?

are ?

A. Yes.

Q. What is your business?

A.

I am Assistant Compradore to Jardine, Matheson and Company.

Q. And your brothers are Mr. Ho Tung, and Mr. Ho Fook ?

A. Yes.

Mr. Fung Wa Chun.-Mr. Ho, you know in a Chinese house, there are cubicles. Dont you know that Chinese want cubicles?

A. Yes.

Q.-Well, do you know the present Ordinance, that only one cubicle is allowed on the first floor?

A. Yes, I know.

Q.-Is that a good law?

A. It is not.

Q.--Why ?

Then they

A. Not many people for $10 or $20 can get one floor to live on. have to take cubicles, and a cubicle costs $4 or $5 a month, and they get on with that; because this Ordinance does not allow the cubicles to be partitioned off, a number of people have gone back to the country. I take it, and I am sure of it, that the Government knows it too, when there was a census taken a while ago, that there has been less people, because there have not been enough cubicles.

Q.--Do you think you ought to allow as many cubicles on a floor 30 feet long, as on a floor 50 feet long, or do you make some distinction ?

A. There should be a distinction.

Q-Well, say a house including kitchen and yard, 50 feet long, how many cubicles do you think the Chinese ought to have?

A. Three or four.

Q.-Ought to have three or four?

A. Yes.

Q. To make the rent $5 a cubicle?

A. Yes.

Q.--And what about the 30 feet room?

A-Two to three.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.