Sessional_Paper_1907 — Page 144

Sessional Papers 議政定例兩局文件 All

68

Q.-Would they have been of any value to you in forecasting the typhoon of the 18th September ?

use to

A.-No.

Q.--The remarks telegraphed by competent observers in the Philippines would be of

you ?

A.—No, not at all: all the facts are condensed in the telegrains. Loose remarks outside the informatiom we receive would be useless.

Q.-I am not speaking of loose remarks. Would not your own remarks for instance be useful to other places?

A.-No and it would take up the cables too much.

Q.-A witness produced a letter (Exhibit H) purporting to have been written to the Commander of a French warship by the Director of the Sicawei Observatory in which the Director states that he sent out the following warnings on the 16th September (1) Typhoon S of Meiaco Sima, (2) Typhoon E of Formosa; did you receive these?

A.-No.

Q.-Would such warnings have predicted bad weather S of Formosa ?

A. Yes, but we had the same telegrams from there as soon as Sicawei.

Q.-Please tell me whether any and if so what weather signals were hoisted at the Signal Hill on September 13th to 17th inclusive?

A.-13th.-A depression is in the centre of the Formosa Channel moving NW. On the 14th to 17th nothing. The depression was filling up on the 14th.

Q.-At your last examination you put in your observations at the Observatory, Gap Rock and the Peak on the 17th September. You make no remarks-why not?

A. These are the observations recorded by the computers: The column head "Remarks" is for such things as thunderstorms, etc.

Q. What remarks did you issue about the typhoon of the 18th September?

A.-Exhibit D 5 produced.

Q.-Did Koshun Observatory give you any advices on the 16th which showed a typhoon E of Formosa ?

A.--No.

Q.-You said at your last examination that the first indication of a storm you had on the 18th was about 7.44 a.m. and that the time between 7.44 and 8 a.m. was occupied in consultation and observation with Mr. FIGG. Why did you not hoist the signal pending such consultation and observation?

A.-Because we did not think there was sufficient reason from the evidence we had: we have to be very careful.

(Sir HENRY BERKELEY remarked that he remembered seeing complaints made about the unnecessary hoisting of signals.)

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.