Sessional_Paper_1896 — Page 781

Sessional Papers 議政定例兩局文件 All

( 27 )

Q--What is it-penal diet?

A-Ordinary diet.

Q-Was he on that diet the whole time between the 21st April and the 6th May?

A-Yes.

Q-Was he not ordered penal diet during that time?

A-Yes, he was punished for three days; he had rice and water,

Q--Was that on the 28th April?

A-The 28th April, yes.

Q--Did you examine him before he was flogged a second time?

A-Yes.

Q-Were there any marks, of the result of the first flogging?

A-Only a little discolouration of the skin, as usual.

Q--Were all the wounds of the first flogging healed up?

A--Healed up.

Q-Were any bruises left?

A--No. When a person has been flogged there is a mark left for ever.

Q--What sort of examination of him did you make before the second flogging?

A-I examined the buttocks and the heart and lungs.

Q--Did you know at the time you made the examination that he was to undergo a flogging of twenty-four strokes?

A-Yes.

Q--And in your opinion he was fit to take those twenty-four strokes?

A-Yes.

Q--Were you present at the flogging?

A--I was.

Q-What were the physical results of the second flogging?

A-He had an abscess.

Q-How many?

A-One.

Q-Where was that?

A-It was an abscess on the right side.

Q-Right buttock?

A-Yes. I opened it on Sunday, the 9th.

Q-On the 6th May he got the flogging?

A-Yes, and on the 9th he had an abscess.

Q-Was he sent to the hospital after that flogging?

A-Yes.

Q-How did he stand the flogging?

A-Well.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.