Sessional_Paper_1896 — Page 763

Sessional Papers 議政定例兩局文件 All

(9)

Q-You did not notice the effects of the flogging on that particular occasion? A-No, I did not.

Q -I think you have already said he was admitted to the hospital on the second occasion ?

A-He was admitted to the hospital.

Q-And I suppose he was discharged on the 12th May because his time was up? A---He was discharged on the 12th; his time expired.

Q-There was a second case, warden, in which a man died on the 2nd June. Do you remember that case?

A-I do, Sir.

Q-What was the name of that man?

A-WONG YAU.

Q-

When was he admitted to the Gaol?

A-On the 11th May.

Q-He was subjected to two floggings, was he not?

A-He was.

Q-On the 18th and 23rd May?

A-On the 18th May he received the first six.

Q-And on the 23rd he received twelve strokes?

A-He was reported on the 23rd, but not whipped on that day.

Q- On what day was he whipped?

A-He was whipped on the 25th.

Q-Were you present at both floggings?

A

-I was.

Q-What effect did the flogging of the 18th May have on him?

A-Nothing out of the way.

Q--Did it bring blood?

A-I cannot say.

Q-You were also present at the second flogging, I think you said, on the 25th May-within one week of the previous flogging?

A-I was.

Q-What led to the second flogging being inflicted?

A--Insubordination and refusing to do his task.

-What task was that?

A-Hard labour.

Q-Oakum picking, is that hard labour?

A-No, shot drill.

Q-Was a Justice present then?

A-Yes.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.