RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-1980 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/kh04md207 SILK & SILVER: MACAU, MANILA TRADE 79 › See Spate, op. cit., p. 151, Tien-tse Chang, Sino-Portuguese trade from 1514-1644. Leyden, 1934, pp. 35-38 and 54-56 and Boxer, South China in the sixteenth century. Being the narratives of Galeote Pereira, Fr. Gaspar da Cruz, O.P., Fr. Martin de Rada, O.E.S.A, 1550-1575. Hakluyt Society. 2nd series. CVI, pp. xIV-XX. Bailey W. Diffie and George D. Winius. Foundations of the Portuguese empire 1415-1580. University of Minnesota Press and Oxford University Press, 1977, p. 380. ↑ Cartas que os Padres e Irmaos da Companhia de Jesus escreverao dos Reynos de Japao e China desde anno de 1549 até o de 1580. Evora, 1598. Quoted in Boxer. The Great Ship from Amacon. Annals of Macao and the old Japan trade 1555-1640. Lisbon, 1963, p. 22. * For accounts of the foundation and early history of Portuguese Macau see Duffie and Winius op. cit., pp. 381-392, Jose Maria Braga. The western pioneers and their discovery of Macao, Macao, 1949, pp. 102-139, A. Ljungstadt. An historical sketch of the Portuguese settlements in China. Boston, 1836, pp. 30-46, Boxer. Fidalgos in the Far East 1550-1770. Oxford University Press, 1968, pp. 12-29. "Chang, op cit., p. 98. Ljungstadt, op cit., p. 79. See Boxer. Portuguese society in the Tropics. The Municipal councils of Goa, Macao, Bahia and Luanda 1510-1800. University of Wisconsin Press, 1965, pp. 42-71. See also Montalto de Jesus. Historic Macao. Hong Kong, 1902, pp. 37-40. 12 On the Captains-major see Boxer Great Ship, pp. 8-11 and 179-241, and Idem. Christian century, p. 106. U.H. Boinford writing from Surat to the East India Company of London. 29 April 1636. Quoted in Boxer. Great Ship, p. 1. 14 Boxer, Christian century, pp. 426-427 and 464-465. 15 Quoted in Boxer, Christian century, p. 93. Padre Lourenço Mexia in his report for 1580 makes an almost identical comment. See Boxer, Great Ship, p. 40. 16 Viceregal provisao of 18 April 1584. 17 Boxer, Great Ship, p. 39. J See John Leddy Phelan. The Hispanization of the Philippines. Spanish aims and Filipino responses. University of Wisconsin Press, 1959, pp. 11-12, 42, 101-102 and P. Chaunu. Les Philippines et le Pacifique des Ibériques. Paris, 1960, pp. 43-46. 1 Spate, op cit., pp. 161-164. 20 For a detailed list of Chinese goods brought to Manila see Dr. Antonio de Morga. Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas. Mexico, 1609. Trans. and ed. Hon. H. E. J. Stanley. Hakluyt Society. First series. XXXIX, 1868, pp. 337-339, 21 W. L. Schurz. The Manila galleon. New York, 1939, p. 27. 22 Spate, op cit., p. 162. 23 Boxer, Great Ship, p. 170. ================================================================================ RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-1985 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/gt54s866x 150 JOHN KARL EVANS 59 H.S. Maine, Dissertations on Early Law and Custom (New York, 1886), 54. 60 Ahern (1973), 154-155. 61 Ahern (1973), 155–156; cf. R.L. and D.Y. Janelli, Ancestor Worship and Korean Society, 186-187; and especially Wolf and Huang (1980), 13-15, 333-335, and 337, who comment that 15-20 per cent of all marriages in the Yangtze delta during the period which they studied were uxorilocal, and that this figure may be as high as 40 per cent in Yunnan. Here again, however, it must be pointed out that Yunnan is on the periphery of Chinese culture - as Wolf and Huang emphasize during the course of this analysis, in West Town the native language is Min Chia — and this should warn us against incautious generalizations. The evidence is most appropriately surveyed on a regional basis. For example, on pp. 124-126, and 218, Wolf and Huang analyze data that suggest that, in the period 1886 — 1910, 10.2 - 12.8 per cent of all men marrying for the first time in the northern Taipei basin contracted uxorilocal unions, a figure which jumps to 13.4 - 17.8 per cent for women's first marriages between 1891 and 1915. In contrast, on pp. 351-352 they remark the complete absence of uxorilocal marriages in the New Territories. 62 Ahern (1973), 121-122, and 152; cf. Wolf and Huang (1980), 112. 63 Ahern (1973), 152, and 155. Johnston, Lion and Dragon, 285; and Yang (1945), 82, have also concluded that a person who fails to pass on the family property to his sons is not entitled to a tablet or offerings. 64 Wolf (1974), 156-157; cf. Wolf and Huang (1980), 62. 65 Harrell (1976), 379. 66 Wolf (1976), 361; cf. 356-357, and Wolf (1974), 153, and 155-156. 67 On the Voconian and Falcidian legislation, cf. F. de Zulueta, The Institutes of Gaius, 1 (Oxford, 1946), 112-113; F. Schulz, Classical Roman Law (Oxford, 1951), 205-206; W.W. Buckland, A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. rev. P. Stein (Cambridge, 1963), 290-291, 342-343; H.F. Jolowicz, Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 1965), 257-259; A. Watson, The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic (Oxford, 1971), 173. 68 CIL 11.1436 = ILS 7258. 69 W.W. Lambert, L.M. Triandis, and M. Wolf, "Some Correlates of Beliefs in the Malevolence and Benevolence of Supernatural Beings: a Cross-societal Study”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58 (1959), 162. 70 Jour. Amer. Folk., 71 (1958), 457, although on p. 454 Gough notes that a child's maternal uncle, who has authority over him in Nayar society, is an exceptionally stern disciplinarian. 71 Goody (1962), 409–410; cf. 328. 72 On this point, see also S. Freud, Totem and Taboo (New York, 1952), 58-61. Goody (1962), 20-25, provides a brief but excellent overview of the history of the academic debate on spirit behavior. 73 M. Freedman, Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwantung (London, 1966), 151; Social Organization, 95, 98. 74 Hsu (1967), 65, 223. ================================================================================