RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-1968 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/66833948d 60 H. A, RYDINGS and "Monthly Periodicals" — including Quarterly Review and Once a Week. The complete list is reproduced here, rearranged alphabetically: All the Year Round Blackwood's Magazine Calcutta Englishman Chambers's Journal China Express China Mail Colombo Observer Cornhill Magazine Daily Press Dublin's Magazine Frank Leslie's Illustrated Fraser's Magazine Friend of China Friend of India Galignani's Messenger Hongkong Government Gazette Harper's Weekly Illustrated London News Japan Herald London Society Macmillan's Magazine Navy List North China Herald Once a Week Pall Mall Gazette Punch Quarterly Review Saturday Review Singapore Straits Times Sporting Magazine Straits Times Extra Sydney Morning Herald The Times Weekly Alta Many of these titles have, of course, long since ceased to be published, but it is perhaps surprising how many have survived, whilst others are still used for research purposes, although no longer ================================================================================ RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-1973 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/8910rj06r 44 PETER WESLEY-SMITH 2 See Wong Chung Hong, "Walled and Moated a Hong Kong Village" Arts of Asia, Vol. 1, No. 4, July-August 1971. This article is accompanied by architectural drawings of Kat Hing Wai. See also Sun Hok-p'ang, "Legends and Stories of the New Territories. III. Kam Tin” Hong Kong Naturalist, Vol. VIII, Nos. 3 and 4, December 1936, pp. 255-6. 3 Stewart Lockhart's Report is relatively well known; it is published in Confidential Print, Eastern No. 66, Serial No. 51, p. 83: C.O.882/5, 4 "Journal of Inspection through the Newly Leased Territory”, and Stewart Lockhart to Acting Colonial Secretary (undated), Nos. 27 and 29 in "Papers Regarding the New Territory, Hong Kong", in Stewart Lockhart's Papers, Vol. 3. These papers are deposited in the National Library of Scotland, Acc. 4138, and are used here with permission. 5 Hongkong Weekly Press. Vol. XLVIII, September 17, 1898, p. 239. 6 See note 4 above. 7 See note 5 above. 8 Serial No. 172 (see note 3 above). 9 See R. G. Groves, "Militia, Market and Lineage: Chinese Resistance to the Occupation of Hong Kong's New Territories in 1899” JHKBRAS, Vol. 9 (1969), p. 31. 10 Stubbs to Thomas, No. 246, June 7, 1924, enclosure 3: minute by W. G. Gerrard, Assistant Superintendent of Police (New Territories), dated June 2, 1924: Stewart Lockhart's Papers, Vol. 5. The Hon. Mr. Bird incorrectly recalled at the re-opening ceremony in 1925 that he saw the gates carried into the Tai Po camp on the day the Union Jack was hoisted there (that is, April 16, 1899). He also stated that it took ten coolies to carry each gate: Hong Kong Telegraph, May 27, 1925. 11 Entry for May 4, 1899, in a diary kept by Stewart Lockhart and contained in Vol. 36 of his Papers. 12 See entries for May 9 and May 29, 1899, in ibid. 13 K. O'Dwyer, S. J., "Kam T'in. Memories and Legends" The Rock, April, 1940, pp. 157-62. 14 A. E. Collins to Stewart Lockhart, August 19, 1924: Stewart Lockhart's Papers, Vol. 5. 15 O'Dwyer, op. cit., p. 162. 16 A translation of this Address is in the Colonial Secretariat Library, bound together with the official programme for the ceremony and the Hong Kong Telegraph's report of the proceedings. 17 Hong Kong Telegraph, May 27, 1925, 18 Ibid. ================================================================================ RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-1985 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/gt54s866x 23 Christians or Eurasians. He expressed the opinion that such groups had given up their heritage; he himself was an ardent Confucian and promoted the building of the Confucian Hall in Sookunpoo. He sarcastically added that “as people had already been admitted into the European paradise on earth, he thought it was scarcely fair to debar them from using the passage to the European paradise in heaven”. (The Weekly Press, 17 April 1909) The Hong Kong Telegraph took up the cause; Lau Chu-pak was one of its owners. Following the April meeting of the Sanitary Board in which Mr. Lau had expressed the opinions given above, it ran an editorial entitled “More Class Legislation in Hongkong”. The editorial linked the cemetery question with what the paper regarded as a growing movement towards the enactment of class legislation. "The fact of the matter is that this sort of petty municipal legislation is all of a piece with the policy of the Government in reserving special lands for the bon ton of the Colony. First, they decreed that in life the Chinese should not live in the vicinity of the Peak, and now in death the Chinese are not deemed fitting occupants of lairs in the public cemetery.” The editor asked for consideration for the Chinese who were seeking a better deal for their dead: “Fancy the outcry there would be among the elite if the remains of the deceased predecessors were subjected to removal at the whim and caprice of some insignificant official in a Government Department. That in itself should constitute a plea for the Chinese that they have a right of interment in the Colonial Cemetery." Indeed, “the Colonial or Protestant, or whatever fancy name anybody might wish to call it, the public cemetery of Hong Kong is maintained out of the rates and taxes provided by the residents in the Colony. It is no more a private institution than the public gardens. No sect or body has a right to say that it has any particular claim on the domain; as far as we can make out, all have an equal right to interment”. The Christian Cemetery Ordinance of 1909 The Government decided to draft legislation which would create separate sections in the cemetery where only those ================================================================================ RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-1986 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/jq08c7063 189 It was not only the pious part of the community in San Francisco that noted the arrival of A-chick in 1852. His appearance brought forth press comment. He did not fit the general stereotype of the Chinese immigrant. The Alta California in May, 1852, headed an article: “An Educated Celestial." It began with the statement: "A well-educated and intelligent Chinaman is a being rarely met with in this country, although the Chinese population is so large. The article then mentioned the occasion on which A-chick attracted public notice and proceeded to introduce him to the reader. His advent in California was important because of his fluency in English. The courts in San Francisco faced much the same problem as those in Hongkong in dealing with cases involving Chinese. There was no proper interpretation of evidence. The paper noted: "A great deal of difficulty has been occasioned by the want of a good interpreter and in many cases in which celestials were parties, it has been impossible to elicit the facts, for want of a person who is well versed in the language.” Suddenly A-chick appeared in court, an object of surprise and amazement, “speaking our language with remarkable correctness and fluency, and exhibiting the marks of a highly polished and refined education,” The reason for his presence in court was the belligerent threats of one Mr. Simmons against him and a companion. Mr. Simmons had threatened “to stave in their heads and pull their pig tails out by the roots." The incident reflected the hostile treatment frequently experienced by a Chinese in those days. But in A-chick Mr. Simmons had dealings with no ordinary Chinese. Knowing the workings of the law by reason of his employment in the Hongkong courts before coming to California, he was not to submit meekly to such bullying. He asked the court for an order against Mr. Simmons. In defence, Mr. Simmons said he had used abusive language because the two Chinese had been rude. ================================================================================ RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 | RAS-2001 https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/zg651950g 275 11-4 THE CHINESE CEMETERIES QUESTION, The China Mail, 12th July 1901. Lau was listed after Ho Kai and Wei Yuk in the Board, see Arnold Wright (ed) (1990), 20TH CENTURY IMPRESSIONS OF HONG KONG, Singapore: Graham Brash, p. 174. (The book was first published in 1908.) us The Hongkong Weekly Press and China Overland Trade Report, 17 April 1909. 116 HKGG Notice 229 of 25 July 1913. The rules and regulations of the cemetery are given in the same notice. This may partly be due to the Anglo-Japanese Alliance of 1902. 18 Davis, S.G. (1949). HONG KONG IN ITS GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING. London: Collins, p. 96. 119 HKGG Notification 12 of 20th January 1911. 120 The first Japanese burial in the Colonial Cemetery was a young second lieutenant in the Imperial Japanese Army who died in Hong Kong in 1878 while on the way back to Japan. His grave lies in §27 section in the cemetery. 121 A small number of Japanese were buried at Caroline Hill Cemetery, whose remains were later reinterred in the Colonial Cemetery, when former was cleared. 122 Between 1878-1945, there were about 465 Japanese buried in the Colonial Cemetery. For details of the Japanese burials, see £#✯ (1988), #* • * 人基地一船員墓碑中心,港日關係之回顧與前瞻,香港日本文化協會二十五週年紀念特集,香港:香港日本文化協會,pp.132-141.(The article was originally written in 1973 when the author was posted to the Japanese Consulate General in Hong Kong.) Also see a local Japanese newspaper, WEEKLY HONG KONG, 5 October 2000, p. 7. 123 A highly interesting article on the subject, titled THE EXHILARATING TOPIC OF GRAVES', can be found in The Hongkong Telegraph, 10th November 1909, p. 4. It was also reported and discussed in The Hongkong Weekly Press and China Overland Trade Report, 20th February 1909, p. 142 and 17th April 1909, pp. 311-312. 124 Hong Kong Hansard 1909, pp. 168-169. ================================================================================