[
    {
        "id": 214105,
        "series_id": 26,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-rashkb-journal-engine",
        "series_title": "RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "RAS-1997",
        "page_number": 173,
        "title": "RAS-1997",
        "content_text": "142\n\nFor the first stage, the Macau Administration selected a team led by a Hong Kong-based planning practice, P&T Group, who teamed with Siza Vieira and Fernando Tavora of Portugal, to design the reclamation of the Porto Exterior, the outer harbour. This team submitted plans in 1984 consisting of a rectilinear urban grid of 144 m by 72 m, which can be seen, in the southeast portion of Figure 6. The plan consists of large blocks, four wide to the west and two wide to the east, six blocks deep on the north-south axis. A central reserve parts the east and west sections and is continued on to the shore to provide a visual connection. A park lies to the east, disconnected and inaccessible from the rest of Macau except through the new development. All this is placed on a podium created by separating the reclamation from the existing edge with a canal for surface water drainage. Thus, the result is distinct and different urban fabric from which has preceded it.\n\nThe second stage was the reclamation of the outer harbour beside the Praia Grande. This was conceived initially as simply a reclamation of the bay resulting in a straightened waterfront and a semi-circular flat plate of land on which to develop. After a competition, the winning scheme (by Manuel Vicente) was revealed to propose not to reclaim straight across the bay but to create instead two large pools of water and an island. The area is defined by a causeway in an arc that inverts the broad Praia Grande of the past and a second causeway linking around the Barra at the southern tip. Twelve blocks are positioned on the north-east edge of the ponds to create a clear urban edge to the water. The Praia itself is to be widened by reclaiming some space along the water's edge, restoring the grandeur of the avenue that has been eroded by traffic, parking and development. In 1991, the \"Reorganisation of the Praia Grande\" was gazetted with the following aims (Prescott 1993):\n\nFigure 6: 1996\n\n1. to reinforce the diverse economic base of Macau\n\n2. to create an image of the city to attract investment and an environment attractive to scientific personnel, technicians and managers all of whom form an indispensable necessity for the coherent",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/dfo323lmgvd/RAS-1997.txt",
        "external_url": "https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/wp98g7579",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 214106,
        "series_id": 26,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-rashkb-journal-engine",
        "series_title": "RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "RAS-1997",
        "page_number": 174,
        "title": "RAS-1997",
        "content_text": "143\n\ndevelopments and economic viability of Macau,\n\nSubsequently, the plans have changed, the pools of salt water are now fresh water in order to preserve acceptable water quality and odours. The Barrier walls and causeways are in place but the development on hold as the investments and attractions have failed to materialise.\n\nSummary\n\nIn common with cities that share its Mediterranean heritage, Macau was well provided with public spaces that constituted important defining nodes for the action and activities of its citizens. Since it was founded in 1557, however, Macau has doubled the area of the city through reclamation. Over this period, public spaces have been gained and lost. A significant reclamation project was initiated in 1982 in an attempt to re-establish major public spaces as the defining elements of the city and the results are salutary for those considering the creation of land as an effective strategy. Macau has lost its importance as a hub for commerce and transportation, although efforts are made periodically to regain some of that role.\n\nThe future holds a possible promise for the city as a centre of trade and finance on a regional level and, as such, it will have to prove itself as a desirable place to live. Recent developments of the waterfront are attempts to recreate such a desirable environment in the context of natural (such as silting) and manmade problems (such as congestion). Macau has a unique urban heritage with which to work. Being a small place, even slight changes to the waterfront can profoundly affect the sense of the city overall. Inappropriate reclamation can easily destroy the distinct urban sense of Macau. Proposed infill between Taipa and Coloane will significantly change the balance of the city. Being reclamation on a large scale creating a substantial flat area between the two islands, it will result in a new city without the particular characteristics of Macau.\n\nAcknowledgements\n\nThe authors wish to acknowledge the patience of Mr. Manuel Vicente in explaining his scheme for Macau and for access to his",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/dfo323lmgvd/RAS-1997.txt",
        "external_url": "https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/wp98g7579",
        "rank": 0
    }
]