[
    {
        "id": 214800,
        "series_id": 26,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-rashkb-journal-engine",
        "series_title": "RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "RAS-1999",
        "page_number": 215,
        "title": "RAS-1999",
        "content_text": "180\n\nfew would assent to such a simple typology today, it remains a powerful root metaphor for distinctions between the traditional and the modern driving even much of current research,35\n\n37\n\nAn interesting seminar organised in 1998 by Charles Stafford at the LSE around the general topic of 'separations' allowed me to realise the really rather simple truth that no community is ever wholly a 'face-to-face' one. From our earliest years we must confront, and learn to deal with, the fact of separation from those who are closest to us and whose relationships with us we learn to characterise as love. Husbands are constantly being parted from their wives, children from their parents and each other, every day, and in their absences we create imaginary images and representations of those who have left us or whom we have left which are continually confirmed, or challenged, by their returns or failures to return. This is what community is about; not 'face-to-face' communications, for there never was much of that - but absence, parting, separation, and death.38\n\nThis is the real meaning, and importance, of community; that somehow we form abstract bonds of representation of those from whom we are regularly parted and who regularly return or are returned to us.39 These are indeed the social relations which Radcliffe-Brown talked about, and they are in a very important sense - as Levi-Strauss clearly saw - both abstract, and imaginatively constructed. And this is where the enormous power of the imagination comes in, in constructing relations which become so real that Radcliffe-Brown could compare them to the structures of seashells.*\n\n40\n\nIn this sense the nation is indeed, as Ben Anderson (1983) showed in another famous phrase, an imagined community - but so is any community. Any community, or family, is in this sense a virtual one, as indeed are nation-states. Again as Anderson saw clearly, what is qualitatively different about the 'nation-state' is the kinds of communication means it employs to construct its own (virtual, or imaginary) identity; print media, modern or 'hyper-real' telecommunications. It is in this sense, through the employment of new means of communication, that the Hmong are becoming a virtual nationality, and this may also be true of other societies in the region.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/dfo323lmgvd/RAS-1999.txt",
        "external_url": "https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/s178b887x",
        "rank": 0
    },
    {
        "id": 214807,
        "series_id": 26,
        "series_slug": "histsyn-rashkb-journal-engine",
        "series_title": "RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊",
        "series_use_hku_proxy": false,
        "document_key": "RAS-1999",
        "page_number": 222,
        "title": "RAS-1999",
        "content_text": "187\n\nThousand Oaks, New Delhi.\n\nbarren\n\nSinn, Elizabeth 1998 'A study of regional associations on a mountain? In the Chinese Diaspora: the Hong Kong Experience, The Chinese Diaspora: selected essays (Vol.1), ed. Wang Ling Chi and Wang Gungwu. Singapore. Times Academic Press.\n\n1995 Emigration from Hong Kong before 1941: General Trends Emigration from Hong Kong : tendencies and impacts, ed. Ronald Skeldon. Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.\n\nSiu, Helen 1999 Hong Kong : Cultural Kaleidoscope on a World Landscape' in Gary Hamilton (ed.) Cosmopolitan Capitalists: Hong Kong and the Chinese Diaspora at the end of the Twentieth Century, Seattle. University of Washington Press.\n\n1996 Remade in Hong Kong: Weaving into the Chinese Cultural Tapestry', Unity and Diversity: Local Cultures and Identities in China, ed. Tao Tao Liu and David Faure. Hong Kong; Hong Kong University Press.\n\nSkeldon, Ronald (ed.) 1995 Emigration from Hong Kong: tendencies and impacts. Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.\n\n(ed.) 1994 Reluctant Exiles? Migration from Hong Kong and the Overseas Chinese. New York. M.E.Sharpe.\n\nSouvannavong, Si-Ambhahaivan Sisombat 1999 'Elites in Exile: The emergence of a transnational Lao culture, Laos: Culture and Society, ed. Grant Evans. Chiang Mai; Silkworm Books.\n\nStewart, Susan 1984 (1993) On Longing; narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham. Duke University Press.\n\nTapp, Nicholas (forthcoming) 'Exiles and Reunions : Nostalgia among overseas Hmong (Miao), The Anthropology of Separations, ed. Charles Stafford. London. The Athlone Press.\n\n1999 'The Consuming or the Consumed? Virtual Hmong in China'.",
        "txt_file_path": "txt/dfo323lmgvd/RAS-1999.txt",
        "external_url": "https://digitalrepository.lib.hku.hk/catalog/s178b887x",
        "rank": 0
    }
]