RAS-1996 — Page 219

RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 All AI Reviewed

193

Table 3: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Interviewees'

Inclined Objectives of Involvement in Education Regard.

Regard Education Regard Education as Evangelization Extremely Important Very Important Quite Important Extremely Regard Very Regard Quite Regard Supervisors 4 0 2 0 7.69% 30.77% 0 38.46% 7.69% 15.38% 0 Principals 21 21 0 2 101% 33.87% 17.74% 33.87% 8.06% 3.23% 16.1% Teachers 1 13 24 X 3 2 47% 19.12% 35.29% 11.76% 4.41% 2.94% Overall 21% 26.57% 19.58% 34.97% 9.79% 4.9% 21%

Table 4: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Interviewees'

Preference in Objectives and Their Mean Scores

Service to the Society Education for the Whole Person Evangelization Providing Christian Nurture among Students Principals (3.05) Principals (3.18) Supervisors (3.15) Teachers (3.25) Teachers (3.31) Teachers (2.19) Supervisors (3.15) Supervisors (2.23) Supervisors (1.46) Principals (2.37) Principals (3.40) Teachers (1.25)

NOTES

5 The author wishes to express his gratitude to the United Board for Christian Higher Education in Asia which sponsored the present study. A full report of the study was published by the Theology Division, Chung Chi College, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. For details, see footnote 3 below.

The statistics are gathered from The Mid-March 1986 Statistical Summary Report (Hong Kong Government, 1986) and Resource Material for Civic Education, Vol. 30 Education (Hong Kong Christian Council, October 1986).

The interviewees were supervisors, principals, RE panel chairmen or teachers who may not have been members of the denominations or even if they were, what they said may not represent the viewpoints of the denominations. The views of the denominations in this study are therefore the interviewees' views. However, the findings in the survey do not vary much from the information extracted from literature review. This proves that the interviewees are representative of their denominations.

For more detailed discussions, please refer to my recent book, Ng, Tze Ming Peter. Church...

Edit History

2026-05-13 08:47:16 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
193 Table 3: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Interviewees' Inclined Objectives of Involvement in Education Regard. Regard Education Regard Education as Evangelization Extremely Important Very Important Quite Important Extremely Regard Very Regard Quite Regard Supervisors 4 0 2 0 7.69% 30.77% 0 38.46% 7.69% 15.38% 0 Principals 21 21 0 2 101% 33.87% 17.74% 33.87% 8.06% 3.23% 16.1% Teachers 1 13 24 X 3 2 47% 19.12% 35.29% 11.76% 4.41% 2.94% Overall 21% 26.57% 19.58% 34.97% 9.79% 4.9% 21% Table 4: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Interviewees' Preference in Objectives and Their Mean Scores Service to the Society Education for the Whole Person Evangelization Providing Christian Nurture among Students Principals (3.05) Principals (3.18) Supervisors (3.15) Teachers (3.25) Teachers (3.31) Teachers (2.19) Supervisors (3.15) Supervisors (2.23) Supervisors (1.46) Principals (2.37) Principals (3.40) Teachers (1.25) NOTES 5 The author wishes to express his gratitude to the United Board for Christian Higher Education in Asia which sponsored the present study. A full report of the study was published by the Theology Division, Chung Chi College, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. For details, see footnote 3 below. The statistics are gathered from The Mid-March 1986 Statistical Summary Report (Hong Kong Government, 1986) and Resource Material for Civic Education, Vol. 30 Education (Hong Kong Christian Council, October 1986). The interviewees were supervisors, principals, RE panel chairmen or teachers who may not have been members of the denominations or even if they were, what they said may not represent the viewpoints of the denominations. The views of the denominations in this study are therefore the interviewees' views. However, the findings in the survey do not vary much from the information extracted from literature review. This proves that the interviewees are representative of their denominations. For more detailed discussions, please refer to my recent book, Ng, Tze Ming Peter. Church...
Baseline (Original)
193 Table 3: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Interviewees' Inclined Objectives of Involvement in Education Regard. Regard Educamm Education Regard Education XIN Extremely Very 1/ Quite Quite Regard Regard Both as Evangeliz Evangeliz- Evangeliz- Important | ation as ation as ation as Very Extremely Regard Regard Important Important Important Important Important | Important Supervisors } 4 0 2 0 7.690 30 77% 0 38.46% 7.69% 15 38% 0 Pimcipals 21 21 2 101% 33 87% 1774% 33 87% 806 3.23% 161% Teachers 1 13 " 24 X 3 2 | 47% 19 12% 25% 35 29% 11 76% 441% 2 94% Overall 21% 26.57% 19 58% 34.97% 9 79% 4.9% 21% Table 4: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Intervievees' Preference in Objectives and Their Mean Scores Service to Education for Evangelization the Society the Whole Person Providing Christian Nurture among Students Principals (3:05)] Principals (118) Supervisors(315) Teachers (125) Teachers (331) Teachers (219) Supervisors (315) Supervisors(2 23) Teachers (3.25) Supervisors(1-46). Principals (237) Puncipals (340) NOTES 5 The author wishes to express his gratitude to the United Board for Christian Higher Education in Asia which sponsored the present study. A full report of the study was published by the Theology Division, Chung Chi College. The Chinese University of Hong Kong For details, see footnote 3 below The statistics are gathered from The Mid-March 1986 Statistical Summar vReport (Hong Kong Government, 1986) and Resource Material for Civic Edie ation, Vol 30 Education (Hong Kong Christian Council, October 1986) The interviewees were supervisors, prmcipals, RE panel chanmen of teachers who may not have been menibers of the denominations or even if they were, what they said may not represent the viewpoints of the denominations The views of the denominations in this study are therefore the interviewees' views. However, the findings in the survey do not vary much from the information extracted from literature review. This proves that the Interviewees are representative of then denominations For more detailed discussions, please refer to my recent book, Ng. Tze Ming Peter. Church
2026-05-13 08:47:16 · Baseline
View content

193

Table 3: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Interviewees'

Inclined Objectives of Involvement in Education

Regard.

Regard

Educamm

Education

Regard Education

XIN

Extremely Very

1/ Quite

Quite

Regard Regard Both as Evangeliz Evangeliz- Evangeliz- Important | ation as ation as ation as

Very Extremely

Regard Regard

Important Important Important

Important Important | Important

Supervisors

}

4

0

2

0

7.690

30 77%

0

38.46%

7.69%

15 38%

0

Pimcipals

21

21

2

101%

33 87%

1774%

33 87%

806

3.23%

161%

Teachers

1

13

"

24

X

3

2

| 47%

19 12%

25%

35 29%

11 76%

441%

2 94%

Overall

21%

26.57%

19 58%

34.97%

9 79%

4.9%

21%

Table 4: A Comparison of the Three Groups of Intervievees'

Preference in Objectives and Their Mean Scores

Service to

Education for

Evangelization

the Society

the Whole Person

Providing Christian Nurture among Students

Principals (3:05)] Principals (118) Supervisors(315) Teachers (125) Teachers (331)

Teachers (219)

Supervisors (315)

Supervisors(2 23)

Teachers (3.25)

Supervisors(1-46).

Principals (237)

Puncipals (340)

NOTES

5

The author wishes to express his gratitude to the United Board for Christian Higher Education in Asia which sponsored the present study. A full report of the study was published by the Theology Division, Chung Chi College. The Chinese University of Hong Kong For details, see footnote 3 below

The statistics are gathered from The Mid-March 1986 Statistical Summar vReport (Hong Kong Government, 1986) and Resource Material for Civic Edie ation, Vol 30 Education (Hong Kong Christian Council, October 1986)

The interviewees were supervisors, prmcipals, RE panel chanmen of teachers who may not have been menibers of the denominations or even if they were, what they said may not represent the viewpoints of the denominations The views of the denominations in this study are therefore the interviewees' views. However, the findings in the survey do not vary much from the information extracted from literature review. This proves that the Interviewees are representative of then denominations

For more detailed discussions, please refer to my recent book, Ng. Tze Ming Peter. Church

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.