RAS-1970 — Page 107

RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 All AI Reviewed

102

K. M. A. BARNETT

All these relationships can, of course, be clearly expressed in Cantonese. But before we turn to Cantonese let me observe that English finds it natural to record the status of one of the agents but not the other. By saying "my boots" instead of "the boots" we convey, don't we, the gratuitous information that it's not my job to clean boots. We don't feel it necessary to include this information about the bearer of the letter.

In Chinese it's the other way round. The most natural way to render the first sentence

"When he brought the letter I had cleaned my boots”

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI PAAISEON
LRAY10

This does not tell whether the shoes are my own or someone else's, but it tells you that he's the postman delivering letters on a regular schedule.

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI DRAISEON
LRAY11

This tells you that he's a member of my own staff or household.

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI SUNGSEON
LRAY12

This tells you that he's a member of the staff or household of whoever sent the letter.

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI GHAAWSEON
LRAY13

This tells you that the writer of the letter brought it himself. In matters of fetching and carrying Cantonese is particularly pernickety. Whereas English focuses on the direction, e.g.:

FETCH (i.e. to go somewhere and bring something back)
TAKE (i.e. to go and leave it there)
BRING (i.e. to come with it)
CARRY (i.e. neither specially to bring, take or fetch)

10 我擦完鞋佢至派信嚟
11 我擦完鞋佢至遞信嚟
12 我擦完鞋佢至送信嚟
13 我擦完鞋佢至交信嚟

Edit History

2026-05-12 18:12:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

102 K. M. A. BARNETT All these relationships can, of course, be clearly expressed in Cantonese. But before we turn to Cantonese let me observe that English finds it natural to record the status of one of the agents but not the other. By saying "my boots" instead of "the boots" we convey, don't we, the gratuitous information that it's not my job to clean boots. We don't feel it necessary to include this information about the bearer of the letter. In Chinese it's the other way round. The most natural way to render the first sentence "When he brought the letter I had cleaned my boots” is NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI PAAISEONLRAY10 This does not tell whether the shoes are my own or someone else's, but it tells you that he's the postman delivering letters on a regular schedule. NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI DRAISEONLRAY11 This tells you that he's a member of my own staff or household. NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI SUNGSEONLRAY12 This tells you that he's a member of the staff or household of whoever sent the letter. NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI GHAAWSEONLRAY13 This tells you that the writer of the letter brought it himself. In matters of fetching and carrying Cantonese is particularly pernickety. Whereas English focuses on the direction, e.g.: FETCH (i.e. to go somewhere and bring something back)TAKE (i.e. to go and leave it there)BRING (i.e. to come with it)CARRY (i.e. neither specially to bring, take or fetch) 10 我擦完鞋佢至派信嚟11 我擦完鞋佢至遞信嚟12 我擦完鞋佢至送信嚟13 我擦完鞋佢至交信嚟

Baseline (Original)

102 K. M. A. BARNETT All these relationships can, of course, be clearly expressed in Cantonese. But before we turn to Cantonese let me observe that English finds it natural to record the status of one of the agents but not the other. By saying "my boots" instead of "the boots" we convey, don't we, the gratuitous information that it's not my job to clean boots. We don't feel it necessary to include this informa- tion about the bearer of the letter. In Chinese it's the other way round. The most natural way to render the first sentence "When he brought the letter I had cleaned my boots” is NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI PAAISEON LRAY10 This does not tell whether the shoes are my own or someone else's, but it tells you that he's the postman delivering letters on a regular schedule. NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI DRAISEON LRAY!! This tells you that he's a member of my own staff or household. NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI SUNGSEON LRAY12 This tells you that he's a member of the staff or household of whoever sent the letter. NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI GHAAWSEON LRAY13 This tells you that the writer of the letter brought it himself. In matters of fetching and carrying Cantonese is particularly pernickety. Whereas English focusses on the direction, e.g.: FETCH (i.e. to go somewhere and bring something back) TAKE (ie. to go and leave it there) BRING (i.e. to come with it) CARRY (i.e. neither specially to bring, take or fetch) 10 我擦完鞋佢至派信? 12 我擦完鞋低至送信嚟 LL 我擦完鞋低至遞信嚶 13 我擰完鞋佢至交佶嚟

2026-05-12 18:12:02 · Baseline

View content

102

K. M. A. BARNETT

In Chinese it's the other way round. The most natural way to render the first sentence

"When he brought the letter I had cleaned my boots”

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI PAAISEON

LRAY10

This does not tell whether the shoes are my own or someone else's, but it tells you that he's the postman delivering letters on a regular schedule.

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI DRAISEON

LRAY!!

This tells you that he's a member of my own staff or household.

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI SUNGSEON

LRAY12

This tells you that he's a member of the staff or household of whoever sent the letter.

NGROR CAATJRYNN XRAAY KREOE ZI GHAAWSEON

LRAY13

This tells you that the writer of the letter brought it himself. In matters of fetching and carrying Cantonese is particularly pernickety. Whereas English focusses on the direction, e.g.:

FETCH (i.e. to go somewhere and bring something back) TAKE (ie. to go and leave it there)

BRING (i.e. to come with it)

CARRY (i.e. neither specially to bring, take or fetch)

10 我擦完鞋佢至派信? 12 我擦完鞋低至送信嚟

LL 我擦完鞋低至遞信嚶 13 我擰完鞋佢至交佶嚟

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.