RAS-1967 — Page 154

RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 All AI Reviewed

SALT MANUFACTURE IN HONG KONG

Year Production Price etc. 1928 1929 10,200 piculs "as against 18,000 piculs in 1928" 1930 17,000 piculs. 1931 7,090 piculs. 12,760 1932 Approximately 147 piculs, "most of which was exported" 1933 14,000 piculs. 1934 14,000 piculs. 1935 11,000 piculs. 1936 13,500 piculs. 1937 17,200 piculs. 1938 25,000 piculs.

Salt pans did well; in some cases it is said the output was more than doubled, and it is certain that it was on the whole considerably increased.

The demand for salt was smaller than usual - a decrease which is probably due to the famine conditions prevailing in parts of China during the drought,

A good year for salt pan owners. The serious decline in output is said to have been due to the heavy rains which fell throughout the summer and flooded the salt pans.

The salt pans did average business. The major portion of Tai O salt is exported to Chinese Territory and to Hong Kong,

The value declined from $13,000 to $10,000. The greater part was exported to Chinese Territory.

The price also fell to the very low figure of 63 cents a picul. The greater part was exported to Chinese Territory. The price also rose.

Prices were well sustained.

The most successful local industry, the price also improving.

Edit History

2026-05-12 17:06:33 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
SALT MANUFACTURE IN HONG KONG Year Production Price etc. 1928 1929 10,200 piculs "as against 18,000 piculs in 1928" 1930 17,000 piculs. 1931 7,090 piculs. 12,760 1932 Approximately 147 piculs, "most of which was exported" 1933 14,000 piculs. 1934 14,000 piculs. 1935 11,000 piculs. 1936 13,500 piculs. 1937 17,200 piculs. 1938 25,000 piculs. Salt pans did well; in some cases it is said the output was more than doubled, and it is certain that it was on the whole considerably increased. The demand for salt was smaller than usual - a decrease which is probably due to the famine conditions prevailing in parts of China during the drought, A good year for salt pan owners. The serious decline in output is said to have been due to the heavy rains which fell throughout the summer and flooded the salt pans. The salt pans did average business. The major portion of Tai O salt is exported to Chinese Territory and to Hong Kong, The value declined from $13,000 to $10,000. The greater part was exported to Chinese Territory. The price also fell to the very low figure of 63 cents a picul. The greater part was exported to Chinese Territory. The price also rose. Prices were well sustained. The most successful local industry, the price also improving.
Baseline (Original)
SALT MANUFACTURE IN HONG KONG Year Production 147 Price etc. 1928 1929 10,200 piculs "as against 18,000 piculs in 1928". 1930 17,000 piculs. 1931 7,090 piculs. 12,760 1932 Approximately piculs, "most of which was exported", 1933 14,000 piculs. 1934 14,000 piculs. 1935 11,000 piculs. 1936 13,500 piculs. 1937 17,200 piculs. 1938 25,000 piculs. Salt pans did well; in some cases it is said the output was more than doubled, and it is certain that it was on the whole consi- derably increased. The demand for salt was smaller than usual - a decrease which is probably due to the famine. conditions prevailing in parts of China during the drought, A good year for salt pan owners. The serious decline in output is said to have been due to the heavy rains which fell through- out the summer and flooded the salt pans. The salt pans did average busi- ness. The major portion of Tai O salt is exported to Chinese Territory and to Hong Kong, The value declined from $13,000 to $10,000. The greater part was exported to Chinese Terri- tory. The price also fell to the very low figure of 63 cents a picul. The greater part was exported to Chinese Territory. The price also rose. Prices were well sustained. The most successful local indus- try, the price also improving.
2026-05-12 17:06:33 · Baseline
View content

SALT MANUFACTURE IN HONG KONG

Year

Production

147

Price etc.

1928

1929 10,200 piculs "as against 18,000 piculs in 1928".

1930 17,000 piculs.

1931 7,090 piculs.

12,760

1932 Approximately

piculs, "most of which was exported",

1933 14,000 piculs.

1934 14,000 piculs.

1935 11,000 piculs.

1936 13,500 piculs. 1937 17,200 piculs.

1938 25,000 piculs.

Salt pans did well; in some cases it is said the output was more than doubled, and it is certain that it was on the whole consi- derably increased.

The demand for salt was smaller than usual - a decrease which is probably due to the famine. conditions prevailing in parts of China during the drought,

A good year for salt pan owners. The serious decline in output is said to have been due to the heavy rains which fell through- out the summer and flooded the salt pans.

The salt pans did average busi- ness. The major portion of Tai O salt is exported to Chinese Territory and to Hong Kong,

The value declined from $13,000 to $10,000. The greater part was exported to Chinese Terri- tory.

The price also fell to the very low figure of 63 cents a picul. The greater part was exported to Chinese Territory. The price also rose.

Prices were well sustained.

The most successful local indus- try, the price also improving.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.