1964_FIRE_SERVICES_ORDINANCE — Page 32

HK Historical Laws 香港歷史法例 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next Source

1986 Ed.]

Fire Services

[CAP. 95

FORM 3

FIRE SERVICES ORDINANCE

(Section 9(4))

Fire Hazard Order

[s. 9(4).]

To A.B. of

(or to the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of) (describe premises) situate

(insert such

description of the situation as may be sufficient to identify the premises).

WHEREAS the said A.B. (or, the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of the said premises, namely

has this day appeared before me/us,

(describing the court), to answer the matter of a complaint made by etc. that at

in summons):

etc. (follow the words of complaint

[(or, in the case where the party charged does not appear, say, in place of the foregoing)

WHEREAS it has been now proved to my/our satisfaction that a summons has been duly served requiring the said A.B. (or the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of the said premises) to appear this day before me/us to answer the matter of a complaint made by

etc. that etc. (following the words of complaint

in summons):]

(Any of the following orders may be made or a combination of any of them, as the case seems to require).

Now on proof here had before me/us that the fire hazard so complained of does exist at the said premises (add, where the order is made on the person causing the fire hazard-and that the fire hazard is caused by the act, default or sufferance of A.B.), I/we, in pursuance of section 9 of the Fire Services Ordinance, do order the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) within (specify the time) from the service of this order to abate

(here specify the fire hazard to be abated and the manner, whether by compliance with the requirements of the relevant fire hazard abatement notice, or otherwise).

And I/we being satisfied that, notwithstanding that the said fire hazard may be temporarily abated under this order, the fire hazard is likely to recur, do therefore prohibit the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) from allowing the recurrence of the said fire hazard (and for that purpose I/we direct the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge)

[here specify any works to be executed]).

Now on proof here had before me/us that at or recently before the time of making the said complaint, to wit, on

the fire hazard so complained of did exist at the said premises, but that the fire hazard has since been abated (add where the order is made on the person who caused the fire hazard and that the fire hazard was caused by the act, default or sufferance of A.B.), yet, notwithstanding the abatement, I/we, being satisfied that it is likely that the same fire hazard will recur at the said premises, do therefore prohibit (continue as in Prohibition Order No. 1).

Abatement order.

Prohibition Order No. 1.

Prohibition Order

No. 2.

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

(Signed)

Magistrate Justice of the Peace.

(Added, 1 of 1964, s. 8. Amended, L.N. 69/70 and 4 of 1986, s. 5)

Edit History

2026-05-04 17:57:07 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

1986 Ed.] Fire Services [CAP. 95 31 FORM 3 FIRE SERVICES ORDINANCE (Section 9(4)) Fire Hazard Order [s. 9(4).] To A.B. of (or to the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of) (describe premises) situate (insert such description of the situation as may be sufficient to identify the premises). WHEREAS the said A.B. (or, the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of the said premises, namely has this day appeared before me/us, (describing the court), to answer the matter of a complaint made by etc. that at in summons): etc. (follow the words of complaint [(or, in the case where the party charged does not appear, say, in place of the foregoing) WHEREAS it has been now proved to my/our satisfaction that a summons has been duly served requiring the said A.B. (or the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of the said premises) to appear this day before me/us to answer the matter of a complaint made by etc. that etc. (following the words of complaint at in summons):] (Any of the following orders may be made or a combination of any of them, as the case seems to require). Now on proof here had before me/us that the fire hazard so complained of does exist at the said premises (add, where the order is made on the person causing the fire hazard-and that the fire hazard is caused by the act, default or sufferance of A.B.), I/we, in pursuance of section 9 of the Fire Services Ordinance, do order the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) within (specify the time) from the service of this order to abate (here specify the fire hazard to be abated and the manner, whether by compliance with the requirements of the relevant fire hazard abatement notice, or otherwise). And I/we being satisfied that, notwithstanding that the said fire hazard may be temporarily abated under this order, the fire hazard is likely to recur, do therefore prohibit the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) from allowing the recurrence of the said fire hazard (and for that purpose I/we direct the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) [here specify any works to be executed]). Now on proof here had before me/us that at or recently before the time of making the said complaint, to wit, on the fire hazard so complained of did exist at the said premises, but that the fire hazard has since been abated (add where the order is made on the person who caused the fire hazard and that the fire hazard was caused by the act, default or sufferance of A.B.), yet, notwithstanding the abatement, I/we, being satisfied that it is likely that the same fire hazard will recur at the said premises, do therefore prohibit (continue as in Prohibition Order No. 1). Abatement order. Prohibition Order No. 1. Prohibition Order No. 2. Dated this [L.S.] day of (Signed) 19 Magistrate Justice of the Peace. (Added, 1 of 1964, s. 8. Amended, L.N. 69/70 and 4 of 1986, s. 5)

Baseline (Original)

1986 Ed.] Fire Services [CAP. 95 31 FORM 3 FIRE SERVICES ORDINANCE (Section 9(4)) Fire Hazard Order [s. 9(4).] i To A.B. of (or to the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of) (describe premises) situate (insert such description of the situation as may be sufficient to identify the premises). WHEREAS the said A.B. (or, the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of the said premises, namely has this day appeared before me/us, (describing the court), to answer the matter of a complaint made by etc. that at in summons): ) etc. (follow the words of complaint [(or, in the case where the party charged does not appear, say, in place of the foregoing) WHEREAS it has been now proved to my/our satisfaction that a summons has been duly served requiring the said A.B. (or the owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge of the said premises) to appear this day before me/us to answer the matter of a complaint made by etc. that etc. (following the words of complaint at in summons):] (Any of the following orders may be made or a combination of any of them, as the case seems to require). Now on proof here had before me/us that the fire hazard so complained of does exist at the said premises (add, where the order is made on the person causing the fire hazard-and that the fire hazard is caused by the act, default or sufferance of A.B.), I/we, in pursuance of section 9 of the Fire Services Ordinance, do order the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) within (specify the time) from the service of this order to abate (here specify the fire hazard to be abated and the manner, whether by compliance with the requirements of the relevant fire hazard abatement notice, or otherwise). And I/we being satisfied that, notwithstanding that the said fire hazard may be temporarily abated under this order, the fire hazard is likely to recur, do therefore prohibit the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) from allowing the recurrence of the said fire hazard (and for that purpose I/we direct the said A.B. (or, the said owner, tenant, occupier or person in charge) [here specify any works to be executed]). Now on proof here had before me/us that at or recently before the time of making the said complaint, to wit, on the fire hazard so complained of did exist at the said premises, but that the fire hazard has since been abated (add where the order is made on the person who caused the fire hazard and that the fire hazard was caused by the act, default or sufferance of A.B.), yet, notwithstanding the abatement, I/we, being satisfied that it is likely that the same fire hazard will recur at the said premises, do therefore prohibit (continue as in Prohibition Order No. 1). Abatement order. Prohibition Order No. 1. Prohibition Order No. 2. Dated this [L.S.] day of (Signed) 19 Magistrate Justice of the Peace. (Added, 1 of 1964, s. 8. Amended, L.N. 69/70 and $4 of 1986, s. 5)

2026-05-04 17:57:07 · Baseline

View content