CAP. 4]
law.
5.
6.
7.
Supreme Court.
The "Anthes" was not kept on her course as required by
The helm of the "Anthes" was improperly starboarded.
The collision was caused by one or both of the things stated in the fifth and sixth paragraphs hereof, or otherwise by the negligence, of the plaintiff or of those on board the "Anthes".
8. The collision was not caused or contributed to by the defendants, or by any of those on board the "Atlantic".
And by way of counterclaim the defendants say—
They have suffered great damage by reason of the collision. And they claim as follows—
1. Judgment against the plaintiff [and his bail] for the damage occasioned to the defendants by the collision, and for the costs of this action.
2. To have an account taken of such damage, with the assistance of merchants.
3. Such further and other relief as the nature of the case may require.
Dated the
day of
19
(Signed)
C.D., etc., Defendants.
REPLY.
In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong, Admiralty Jurisdiction.
[Title of action.]
The plaintiff denies the several statements contained in the answer and counterclaim, [or admits several statements contained in paragraphs
of the answer and counterclaim, but denies the other statements contained therein].
and
Dated the
day of
(Signed)
b. ("The Julia David")
PETITION.
19
1
A.B.,
Plaintiff.
In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong, Admiralty Jurisdiction.
Writ issued
[Title of action.]
19
1. At about 2 a.m. on the 4th September, 1905, the steamship "Sarpedon", of 1,556 tons register and 225 horse-power, of which the plaintiffs were owners, whilst on a voyage from Shanghai and other ports to London, with a cargo of tea and other goods, was about 80 miles south-west of Ushant.
302
CAP. 4]
law.
5.
6.
7.
Supreme Court.
The "Anthes" was not kept on her course as required by
The helm of the "Anthes" was improperly starboarded.
The collision was caused by one or both of the things stated in the fifth and sixth paragraphs hereof, or otherwise by the neglig- ence, of the plaintiff or of those on board the "Anthes".
8. The collision was not caused or contributed to by the de- fendants, or by any of those on board the "Atlantic”.
And by way of counterclaim the defendants say-
They have suffered great damage by reason of the collision. And they claim as follows—
1. Judgment against the plaintiff [and his bail] for the damage occasioned to the defendants by the collision, and for the costs of this action.
2. To have an account taken of such damage, with the assis- tance of merchants.
3. Such further and other relief as the nature of the case may require.
Dated the
day of
19
(Signed)
C.D., etc., Defendants.
REPLY.
In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong, Admiralty Jurisdiction.
[Title of action.]
The plaintiff denies the several statements contained in the answer and counterclaim, [or admits several statements contain- ed in paragraphs
of the answer and counter- contained therein].
and
claim, but denies the other statements
Dated the
day of
(Signed)
b. ("The Julia David")
PETITION.
19
1
A.B.,
Plaintiff.
In the Supreme Court of Hong Kong, Admiralty Jurisdiction.
Writ issued
[Title of action.]
19
1. At about 2 a.m. on the 4th September, 1905, the steamship "Sarpedon", of 1,556 tons register and 225 horse-power, of which the plaintiffs were owners, whilst on a voyage from Shanghai and other ports to London, with a cargo of tea and other goods, was about 80 miles south-west of Ushant.
302
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.