1950_MAGISTRATES_(FORMS)_RULES — Page 17

HK Historical Laws 香港歷史法例 All AI Reviewed

CAP. 227]

Magistrates.

or before such magistrate as may then be there, to show cause why the recognizance entered into on the

19

whereby you are bound to pay the sum of

day of

should

not be adjudged to be forfeited, and why you should not be adjudged to pay that sum.

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

(Signed.)

FORM 30.

19

Magistrate.

[ss. 28 and 64.]

Adjudication of forfeiture of recognizance where person bound as principal has been convicted of an offence which is a breach of the condition.

HONG KONG,

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at

Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court.

The

day of

19

of

,

19

C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recognizance entered into the

day of

bound in the sum of

the condition of the recognizance being that

should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having been given that the said

has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence], being an offence which is in law a breach of the condition of the said recognizance: Therefore it is adjudged that the said recognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the magistrates' clerk [or other person specified] the said sum of

and do also pay to

the sum of

for costs; and it is ordered that the said sums be paid forthwith [or on or before the

day of 19 or by instalments of

for every first instalment to be paid forthwith or on or before the

19]; and if default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordered [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress]

of

days, the

day

[L.S.]

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

FORM 31.

[ss. 28 and 64.]

Order cancelling or mitigating forfeiture of recognizance, (To be endorsed on recognizance).

HONG KONG,

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at

Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court.

19

day of

declared to be

has applied to me, the

A warrant of distress was, on the

issued for levying the sum of forfeited under the within-written recognizance, but no goods have been sold thereunder; and the said

102

Edit History

2026-05-03 22:23:18 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
CAP. 227] Magistrates. or before such magistrate as may then be there, to show cause why the recognizance entered into on the 19 whereby you are bound to pay the sum of day of should not be adjudged to be forfeited, and why you should not be adjudged to pay that sum. Dated this [L.S.] day of (Signed.) FORM 30. 19 Magistrate. [ss. 28 and 64.] Adjudication of forfeiture of recognizance where person bound as principal has been convicted of an offence which is a breach of the condition. HONG KONG, IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court. The day of 19 of , 19 C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recognizance entered into the day of bound in the sum of the condition of the recognizance being that should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having been given that the said has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence], being an offence which is in law a breach of the condition of the said recognizance: Therefore it is adjudged that the said recognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the magistrates' clerk [or other person specified] the said sum of and do also pay to the sum of for costs; and it is ordered that the said sums be paid forthwith [or on or before the day of 19 or by instalments of for every first instalment to be paid forthwith or on or before the 19]; and if default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordered [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress] of days, the day [L.S.] (Signed.) Magistrate. FORM 31. [ss. 28 and 64.] Order cancelling or mitigating forfeiture of recognizance, (To be endorsed on recognizance). HONG KONG, IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court. 19 day of declared to be has applied to me, the A warrant of distress was, on the issued for levying the sum of forfeited under the within-written recognizance, but no goods have been sold thereunder; and the said 102
Baseline (Original)
CAP. 227] Magistrates. or before such magistrate as may then be there, to show cause why the recognizance entered into on the 19 whereby you are bound to pay the sum of day of should not be adjudged to be forfeited, and why you should not be adjudged to pay that sum. Dated this [L.S.] day of (Signed.) FORM 30. 19 Magistrate. [ss. 28 and 64.] Adjudication of forfeiture of recognizance where person bound as principal has been convicted of an offence which is a breach of the condition. HONG KONG, IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court. The day of 19 of , 19 C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recognizance entered into the day of bound in the sum of the condition of the recognizance being that should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having been given that the said has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence], being an offence which is in law a breach of the condition of the said recognizance: Therefore it is adjudged that the said recognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the magistrates' clerk [or other person specified] the said sum of and do also pay to the sum of for costs; and it is ordered that the said sums be paid forthwith [or on or before the day of 19 or by instalments of for every first instalment to be paid forthwith or on or before the 19 ]; and if default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordered [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress] of days, the day [L.S.] (Signed.) Magistrate. FORM 31. [ss. 28 and 64.] Order cancelling or mitigating forfeiture of recognizance, (To be endorsed on recognizance). HONG KONG, IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court. 19 day of declared to be has applied to me, the A warrant of distress was, on the issued for levying the sum of forfeited under the within-written recognizance, but no goods have been sold thereunder; and the said 102
2026-05-03 22:23:18 · Baseline
View content

CAP. 227]

Magistrates.

or before such magistrate as may then be there, to show cause why the recognizance entered into on the

19

whereby you are bound to pay the sum of

day of

should

not be adjudged to be forfeited, and why you should not be adjudged to pay that sum.

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

(Signed.)

FORM 30.

19

Magistrate.

[ss. 28 and 64.]

Adjudication of forfeiture of recognizance where person bound as principal has been convicted of an offence which is a breach of the condition.

HONG KONG,

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at

Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court.

The

day of

19

of

,

19

C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recognizance entered into the

day of

bound in the sum of

the condition of the recognizance being that

should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having been given that the said

has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence], being an offence which is in law a breach of the condition of the said recognizance: Therefore it is adjudged that the said recognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the magistrates' clerk [or other person specified] the said sum of

and do also pay to

the sum of

for costs; and it is ordered that the said sums be paid forthwith [or on or before the

day of 19 or by instalments of

for every first instalment to be paid forthwith or on or before the

19 ]; and if default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordered [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress]

of

days, the

day

[L.S.]

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

FORM 31.

[ss. 28 and 64.]

Order cancelling or mitigating forfeiture of recognizance, (To be endorsed on recognizance).

HONG KONG,

IN THE MAGISTRATE'S Court at

Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said court.

19

day of

declared to be

has applied to me, the

A warrant of distress was, on the

issued for levying the sum of forfeited under the within-written recognizance, but no goods have been sold thereunder; and the said

102

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.