1923_OPIUM_ORDINANCE__1923 — Page 15

HK Historical Laws 香港歷史法例 All AI Reviewed

OPIUM.

No. 30 of 1923.

2783

(3) No person shall delay or obstruct any detention, arrest, search, inspection, seizure, or removal, which is authorised by this Ordinance.

(4) Any authority given by the Superintendent under this section may be given to an individual or to a class, and may be-

(a) general, so as to embrace all the powers referred to in this section; or

(b) limited, so as to embrace only a portion of those powers; or

(c) particular, for a particular occasion.

32. If any search made under this Ordinance is unsuccessful and there is no reason to suppose that any opium liable to forfeiture under this Ordinance has been thrown away or otherwise disposed of in order to avoid detection, the Superintendent shall make good any damage caused thereby.

Compensation for unsuccessful search to be paid by Superintendent. No action shall be maintainable in respect of any such damage. In the event of any dispute as to the fact or amount of any damage, the dispute shall in every case be decided by the Superintendent or by some person nominated by him for that purpose.

Miscellaneous.

33. In any proceedings before a magistrate or on appeal to the Supreme Court relating to the seizure of any opium, implements, or other articles, the seizure whereof is authorised by any of the provisions of this Ordinance, it shall be lawful for such magistrate and for the judges, and they are hereby respectively required, to proceed in such cases on the merits only, without reference to matters of form and without inquiring into the manner or form of making any seizure, excepting in so far as the manner and form of seizure may be evidence on such merits.

34.-(1) Except as hereinafter mentioned, no information laid under this Ordinance shall be admitted in evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding, and no witness shall be obliged to disclose the name or address of any informer or to state any matter which might lead to his discovery, and if any books, documents or papers which are in evidence or liable to inspection in any civil or criminal proceeding

Rules as to secrecy of information and protection of informers.

Page 15

Page 16

Edit History

2026-05-03 10:51:41 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
OPIUM. No. 30 of 1923. 2783 (3) No person shall delay or obstruct any detention, arrest, search, inspection, seizure, or removal, which is authorised by this Ordinance. (4) Any authority given by the Superintendent under this section may be given to an individual or to a class, and may be- (a) general, so as to embrace all the powers referred to in this section; or (b) limited, so as to embrace only a portion of those powers; or (c) particular, for a particular occasion. 32. If any search made under this Ordinance is unsuccessful and there is no reason to suppose that any opium liable to forfeiture under this Ordinance has been thrown away or otherwise disposed of in order to avoid detection, the Superintendent shall make good any damage caused thereby. Compensation for unsuccessful search to be paid by Superintendent. No action shall be maintainable in respect of any such damage. In the event of any dispute as to the fact or amount of any damage, the dispute shall in every case be decided by the Superintendent or by some person nominated by him for that purpose. Miscellaneous. 33. In any proceedings before a magistrate or on appeal to the Supreme Court relating to the seizure of any opium, implements, or other articles, the seizure whereof is authorised by any of the provisions of this Ordinance, it shall be lawful for such magistrate and for the judges, and they are hereby respectively required, to proceed in such cases on the merits only, without reference to matters of form and without inquiring into the manner or form of making any seizure, excepting in so far as the manner and form of seizure may be evidence on such merits. 34.-(1) Except as hereinafter mentioned, no information laid under this Ordinance shall be admitted in evidence in any civil or criminal proceeding, and no witness shall be obliged to disclose the name or address of any informer or to state any matter which might lead to his discovery, and if any books, documents or papers which are in evidence or liable to inspection in any civil or criminal proceeding Rules as to secrecy of information and protection of informers. Page 15 Page 16
Baseline (Original)
OPIUM. No. 30 of 1923. 2783 (3) No person shall delay or obstruct any detention, arrest, search, inspection, seizure, or removal, which is authorised by this Ordinance. (4) Any authority given by the Superintendent under this section may be given to an individual or to a class, and may be- (a) general, so as to embrace all the powers referred to in this section; or (b) limited, so as to embrace only a portion of those powers; or (c) particular, for a particular occasion. 32. If any search made under this Ordinance is unsuc- Compensa- cessful and there is no reason to suppose that any opium tion for unsuccessful liable to forfeiture under this Ordinance has been thrown search to be away or otherwise disposed of in order to avoid detection, the paid by Superin- Superintendent shall make good any damage caused thereby. tendent. No action shall be maintainable in respect of any such damage. In the event of any dispute as to the fact or amount of any damage, the dispute shall in every case be decided by the Superintendent or by some person nominated by him for that purpose. Miscellaneous. 33. In any proceedings before a magistrate or on appeal Manner of to the Supreme Court relating to the seizure of any opium, soizure not to implements, or other articles, the seizure whereof is authorised into. by any of the provisions of this Ordinance, it shall be lawful for such magistrate and for the judges, and they are hereby respectively required, to proceed in such cases on the merits only, without reference to matters of form and without inquiring into the manner or form of making any seizure, excepting in so far as the manner and form of seizure may be evidence on such merits. information 34.-(1) Except as hereinafter mentioned, no information Rules as to laid under this Ordinance shall be admitted in evidence in secrecy of any civil or criminal proceeding, and no witness shall be and protec obliged to disclose the name or address of any informer or to tion of state any matter which might lead to his discovery, and if any books, documents or papers which are in evidence or liable to inspection in any civil or criminal proceeding informers. Page 15Page 16
2026-05-03 10:51:41 · Baseline
View content

OPIUM.

No. 30 of 1923.

2783

(3) No person shall delay or obstruct any detention, arrest, search, inspection, seizure, or removal, which is authorised by this Ordinance.

(4) Any authority given by the Superintendent under this section may be given to an individual or to a class, and may be-

(a) general, so as to embrace all the powers referred to in this section; or

(b) limited, so as to embrace only a portion of those

powers; or

(c) particular, for a particular occasion.

32. If any search made under this Ordinance is unsuc- Compensa- cessful and there is no reason to suppose that any opium tion for

unsuccessful liable to forfeiture under this Ordinance has been thrown search to be away or otherwise disposed of in order to avoid detection, the paid by

Superin- Superintendent shall make good any damage caused thereby. tendent. No action shall be maintainable in respect of any such damage. In the event of any dispute as to the fact or amount of any damage, the dispute shall in every case be decided by the Superintendent or by some person nominated by him for that purpose.

Miscellaneous.

33. In any proceedings before a magistrate or on appeal Manner of to the Supreme Court relating to the seizure of any opium, soizure not to implements, or other articles, the seizure whereof is authorised into. by any of the provisions of this Ordinance, it shall be lawful for such magistrate and for the judges, and they are hereby respectively required, to proceed in such cases on the merits only, without reference to matters of form and without inquiring into the manner or form of making any seizure, excepting in so far as the manner and form of seizure may be evidence on such merits.

information

34.-(1) Except as hereinafter mentioned, no information Rules as to laid under this Ordinance shall be admitted in evidence in secrecy of any civil or criminal proceeding, and no witness shall be and protec obliged to disclose the name or address of any informer or to tion of state any matter which might lead to his discovery, and if any books, documents or papers which are in evidence or liable to inspection in any civil or criminal proceeding

informers.

Page 15Page 16

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.