1923_MAGISTRATES_ORDINANCE__1890 — Page 74

MAGISTRATES.

No. 3 of 1890.

515

change of circumstances having been given to me], it seems to me just to vary, in manner hereinafter appearing, the order under which the said warrant was issued: Therefore it is ordered that the amount for which it is proposed that the surety [or sureties] of the said C. D/should be [or that the obligation of the said C.D. bound be reduced to

to find a surety [or sureties] be dispensed with] [or as may be directed].

[1..$.]

(Signed.)

FORM NO. 34.

Magistrate.

[s. 53.]

Oral or written acknowledgment of undertaking to pay a sum adjudged by a conviction.

HONGKONG.

that

day of

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

>

suret in the sum of

C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was this day [or was on the 19 ,] convicted before the said court for [state 19 Jat day of' he, on the offence]; and it was adjudged by the said conviction that the defendant should pay [as is the conviction]; and it was thereby ordered that the defendant should be at liberty to give, to the satisfaction of a magistrate of the said Colony [or as in the conviction], security in the sum of

[each] for the payment of with the said sum at the time and in the manner by the said conviction directed: Now therefore I, the said defendant, as principal, and we, E.F., as sureties [or 1, E.F., as surety] hereby undertake that the defendant will pay the sum adjudged by the said conviction at the time and in the manner thereby directed; and I, the said defendant, and we [or 1,] the said sureties [or surety], hereby severally acknowledge ourselves bound to forfeit and pay to the magistrates' clerk for other person specified] the in case the defendant fails to perform this undertaking.

(Signed.) (where pot taken orally)

of

sum of

"

,

and G.H., of

C.D., Defendunt.

J

of

jf

le

E.F.,\

Sureties.

Je

G.H., j

Taken (orally) before me the

day of

19

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

L.]

he

FORM No. 35,

[s. 54.]

Oral or written acknowledgment of undertaking to perform condition of forfeited recognizance.

HONGKONG.

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

C.D. was by his recognizance entered into the

.19, bound in the sum of

of the recognizance being that

day of

the condition should [state condition of

recognizance]; and, default having been made in the performance of

of

con

this condition, the recognizance was on the

day of

19, declared to be forfeited, and the said C.D. not having paid the said sum, a warrant of distress was on the

day of