1912_MAGISTRATES_ORDINANCE__1890 — Page 86

570

No. 3 of 1890.

:

MAGISTRATES.

before such other Magistrate as should then be there, to testify what he should know concerning the said charge so made against the said C.D. as aforesaid; and the said E.F. now appearing before me [or being brought before me by virtue of a warrant in that behalf to testify as aforesaid has been now examined by me touching the pre- mises, but being by me required to enter into a recognizance conditioned to give evidence against the said C.D., has now refused so to do: These are, therefore, to command you the said Constables, to take the said E.F. and him safely to convey to the Gaol and there deliver him to the said Superintendent, together with this pre- cept and you the said Superintendent, to receive the said E.F. into your custody in the said Gaol and there to imprison and safely keep him until after the trial of the said C.D. for the offence aforesaid, unless in the meantime the said E.F. shall duly enter into such recognizance as aforesaid in the sum of

before a Magis- trate of the said Colony, conditioned in the usual form, to appear at the next Criminal Session of the Supreme Court for as the case may be] and there to give evidence on the trial of the said C.D. for the said offence, if an indictment should be filed against him for the same.

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

19

(Signed.)

FORM No. 75.

Magistrate.

(s. 75.]

HONGKONG.

Subsequent Order to discharge the Witness,

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

Gaol in the said Colony. day of

}

To the Superintendent of Whereas by my order, dated the

19 "

reciting that C.D. was lately charged before me for a certain offence mentioned, and E.F., having appeared before me and being examined as a witness for the prosecution in that behalf, refused to enter into a recognizance to give evidence against the said C.D. and I therefore, thereby committed the said E.F. to your custody and required you safely to keep him until after the trial of the said C.D. for the offence aforesaid unless in the meantime he should enter into such recognizance as aforesaid; and whereas, for want of sufficient evidence against the said C.D., the said C.D. has not been committed or holden to bail for the said offence, but on the contrary has been since discharged, and it is therefore not necessary that the said E.F. should be de- tained longer in your custody: These are, therefore, to order and direct you, the said Superintendent, to discharge the said E.F. out of your custody as to the said commitment, and suffer him to go at large.

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

19

7

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

[s. 70.]

ني

S

B.

HONGKONG.

FORM No. 76.

Warrant remanding Accused.

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

To cach and all of the Constables of the said Colony and to the Superintendent of

Gaol in the said Colony.

Whereas C.D. was this day charged before the undersigned, a Magistrate of the said Colony, for that [etc., as in the warrant to apprehend]; and it appears to me to be necessary to remand the said C.D.: These are, therefore, to command you the said Constables, in His Majesty's naine, forthwith to convey the said C.D. to the Gaol and there deliver him to the said Superintendent together with this precept; and you, the said Superintendent, to receive the said C.D. into your custody in the said Gaol and there safely keep him until

day, the

day of

19 when I hereby command you to have him at the said Police Court, at

*As amended by No. 50 of 1911.

As amended by No. 50 of 1911 and No. 51 of 1911.

fu

23 2.98

yo be

in,

en

Ho

C

can

ack