1901_SUMMARY_OFFENCES_ORDINANCE__1845 — Page 7

HK Historical Laws 香港歷史法例 All AI Reviewed

No. 1.] THE ORDINANCES OF HONGKONG: [A.D. 1845.

14. Case of watchman making noise by direction of proprietor of dwelling-house, etc.

investigation and proof of the person having offended against the provisions aforesaid, to proceed against and in a summary manner to fine the person so offending in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars.

14. If, on any such investigation or proof as aforesaid, it appears to such Magistrate that the person so offending acted as watchman or servant of the proprietor or occupier of any dwelling-house, warehouse, or other out-house, office, or premises, or of the inhabitant or person in charge thereof, or by or with the direction, knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of such proprietor or occupier or of such inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to dismiss the charge as against the watchman or servant or person acting as such so offending as aforesaid and to summon or cause to be summoned forthwith before him the proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge thereof as aforesaid, having so directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making such noise as aforesaid, and, on due investigation and proof that any such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making of the said noise so made by the watchman or servant or person acting as such as aforesaid, then it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to fine such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars.

15. When and so often as any such noise as aforesaid is made in or upon any dwelling-house or premises, if it is impracticable or difficult to apprehend, discover, or identify the person so making such noise as aforesaid, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate, on information thereof, to summon before him the proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge, of such dwelling-house or premises, and if it appears, on due investigation and proof, that such noise as aforesaid was made in or upon the said dwelling-house or premises by the direction or with the knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of the proprietor, occupier, inhabitant, or person in charge thereof, to impose on him such and the like penalty as is mentioned in the last preceding section.

16. (1) It shall be lawful for any constable belonging to the Police Force to destroy any dog or other animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state, or which has been bitten by any dog or animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state.

(2) The owner of any such dog or animal who permits the same to go at large, after having information or reasonable ground for believing it to be in a rabid state, or to have been bitten by a dog or other animal in a rabid state, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dollars.

Edit History

2026-05-02 23:47:40 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
No. 1.] THE ORDINANCES OF HONGKONG: [A.D. 1845. 14. Case of watchman making noise by direction of proprietor of dwelling-house, etc. investigation and proof of the person having offended against the provisions aforesaid, to proceed against and in a summary manner to fine the person so offending in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars. 14. If, on any such investigation or proof as aforesaid, it appears to such Magistrate that the person so offending acted as watchman or servant of the proprietor or occupier of any dwelling-house, warehouse, or other out-house, office, or premises, or of the inhabitant or person in charge thereof, or by or with the direction, knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of such proprietor or occupier or of such inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to dismiss the charge as against the watchman or servant or person acting as such so offending as aforesaid and to summon or cause to be summoned forthwith before him the proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge thereof as aforesaid, having so directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making such noise as aforesaid, and, on due investigation and proof that any such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making of the said noise so made by the watchman or servant or person acting as such as aforesaid, then it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to fine such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars. 15. When and so often as any such noise as aforesaid is made in or upon any dwelling-house or premises, if it is impracticable or difficult to apprehend, discover, or identify the person so making such noise as aforesaid, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate, on information thereof, to summon before him the proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge, of such dwelling-house or premises, and if it appears, on due investigation and proof, that such noise as aforesaid was made in or upon the said dwelling-house or premises by the direction or with the knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of the proprietor, occupier, inhabitant, or person in charge thereof, to impose on him such and the like penalty as is mentioned in the last preceding section. 16. (1) It shall be lawful for any constable belonging to the Police Force to destroy any dog or other animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state, or which has been bitten by any dog or animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state. (2) The owner of any such dog or animal who permits the same to go at large, after having information or reasonable ground for believing it to be in a rabid state, or to have been bitten by a dog or other animal in a rabid state, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dollars.
Baseline (Original)
نا. 14 Case of watch- RAH OF SOT- No. 1.] THE ORDINANCES OF HONGKONG: [A.D. 1845. investigation and proof of the person having offended against the pro- visions aforesaid, to proceed against and in a summary manner to fine the person so offending in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars. 14. If, on any such investigation or proof as aforesaid, it appears to such Magistrate that the person so offending acted as watchman or noise by direc servant of the proprietor or occupier of any dwelling-house, warehouse, vant making tion of pro- prietor of dwelling- house, etc. Liability of proprietor, etc., of dwelling. house when person mak- or other out-house, office, or premises, or of the inhabitant or person in charge thereof, or by or with the direction, knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of such proprietor or occupier or of such inhab- itant or person in charge as aforesaid, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to dismiss the charge as against the watch- man or servant or person acting as such so offending as aforesaid and to summon or cause to be summoned forthwith before him the proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge thereof as aforesaid, having so directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making such noise as aforesaid, and, on due investigation and proof that any such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making of the said noise so made by the watchman or servant or person acting as such as aforesaid, then it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to fine such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars, 15. When and so often as any such noise as aforesaid is made in or upon any dwelling-house or premises, if it is impracticable or difficult to apprehend, discover, or identify the person so making such noise as afore- said, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate, on ing noise can- information thereof, to summon before him the proprietor or occupier, or not be appre inhabitant or person in charge, of such dwelling-house or premises, and if it appears, on due investigation and proof, that such noise as aforesaid was made in or upon the said dwelling-house or premises by the direction or with the knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of the pro- prietor, occupier, inhabitant, or person in charge thereof, to impose on him such and the like penalty as is mentioned in the last preceding sec- hended or identified. Power for constable to destroy rabid animal, and penalty on owner for al lowing it to be at large. tion. 16. (1) It shall be lawful for any constable belonging to the Police Force to destroy any dog or other animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state, or which has been bitten by any dog or animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state. . (2.) The owner of of any such dog or animal who permits the same to go at large, after having information or reasonable ground for believing it to be in a rabid state, or to have been bitten by a dog or other animal in a rabid state, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dol- A.I lars 1' to d the and is he or W fire 18 auth than ling- of; : inhal excet 19 there not e ing days. (1 (2. : ( I (3.) I.
2026-05-02 23:47:40 · Baseline
View content

نا.

14

Case of watch-

RAH OF SOT-

No. 1.] THE ORDINANCES OF HONGKONG: [A.D. 1845.

investigation and proof of the person having offended against the pro- visions aforesaid, to proceed against and in a summary manner to fine the person so offending in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars.

14. If, on any such investigation or proof as aforesaid, it appears to such Magistrate that the person so offending acted as watchman or noise by direc servant of the proprietor or occupier of any dwelling-house, warehouse,

vant making

tion of pro-

prietor of dwelling- house, etc.

Liability of proprietor, etc., of

dwelling. house when person mak-

or other out-house, office, or premises, or of the inhabitant or person in charge thereof, or by or with the direction, knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of such proprietor or occupier or of such inhab- itant or person in charge as aforesaid, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to dismiss the charge as against the watch- man or servant or person acting as such so offending as aforesaid and to summon or cause to be summoned forthwith before him the proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge thereof as aforesaid, having so directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making such noise as aforesaid, and, on due investigation and proof that any such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, directed, sanctioned, suffered, or permitted the making of the said noise so made by the watchman or servant or person acting as such as aforesaid, then it shall be lawful for such Magistrate to fine such proprietor or occupier, or inhabitant or person in charge as aforesaid, in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars,

15. When and so often as any such noise as aforesaid is made in or upon any dwelling-house or premises, if it is impracticable or difficult to apprehend, discover, or identify the person so making such noise as afore- said, then and in such case it shall be lawful for such Magistrate, on ing noise can- information thereof, to summon before him the proprietor or occupier, or not be appre

inhabitant or person in charge, of such dwelling-house or premises, and if it appears, on due investigation and proof, that such noise as aforesaid was made in or upon the said dwelling-house or premises by the direction or with the knowledge, sanction, sufferance, or permission of the pro- prietor, occupier, inhabitant, or person in charge thereof, to impose on him such and the like penalty as is mentioned in the last preceding sec-

hended or identified.

Power for constable to

destroy rabid animal, and penalty on owner for al lowing it to be at large.

tion.

16. (1) It shall be lawful for any constable belonging to the Police Force to destroy any dog or other animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state, or which has been bitten by any dog or animal reasonably suspected to be in a rabid state.

. (2.) The owner of

of any such dog or animal who permits the same to go at large, after having information or reasonable ground for believing it to be in a rabid state, or to have been bitten by a dog or other animal in a rabid state, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dol-

A.I

lars

1'

to d the

and

is he

or W

fire

18

auth than ling-

of; : inhal

excet

19 there

not e

ing

days.

(1

(2.

:

(

I

(3.)

I.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.