164
Wán-tsai and Sai-ying-p'ún. As none of these schools however was carried on since the begin-
THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 2ND APRIL, 1879.
人 稍
爲便易也
爲須中
須嚴查而亦無甚大用故不如國家全理其事則請善教之師較 中查有掌教數位於登錄日記紙一事有作弊者此等義學必 學之父兄收討但亦甚難收得耳做監院初署理時在此等義學 人約掌教修金各支一半惟鄉人一半實則該掌教向有子弟來 稍類中國內地村落之館另有十餘間國家輔翼者初國家與鄉 書院外之義學均乃專教華文者致在彼徒之多寡師之優劣則 灣仔兩義學學童必漸增多且宜多請教師以資教化也其餘大 然均未教足一年故此未能言其優劣但按敝監院憶見西營盤
ning of the year, it is impossible at present to
say much about them. But I feel confident that
in Wán-tsai and Sai-ying-pfún it will sooner or later be found necessary to enlarge the teaching
staff in order to meet the demand for English
teaching in these localities. All the other Gov-
ernment schools, outside the Central School,
give only vernacular teaching, and the amount
and quality of instruction they provide is no
better than that of an ordinary village school in
the interior of China. Some of these schools are
called Aided Schools, because the original ar-
rangement was that for each of these schools the
respective village community should provide one
half of the teacher's salary in kind and the Gov-
nment provide the other half in money. In
"ty however the teacher levies a rate on each
attendance and has generally great diffi-
n obtaining even that. In some of these
I discovered soon after beginning the
'nspection, that systematic falsification of endance roll had been practised in
for months. These Aided Schools
supervision and are after all com-
ttle use.
It would be better, in
e Government would take over
rether and place better teachers
-aid schools number now 17.
'7, and 12 in 1876. The total
sented for examination in
of the year amounted to
77, and 390 in 1876. Ac-
otal earned by thẻ Grant---
ted to $4,811.53, as against
and $1,707.00 in 1876. The
ounts annually earned is instance, by the increase of ntroduced in 1877, and in oy a steady increase from number of schools placed
system, in the number of
xamination and the per-
o passed successfully.
間致
+
取法因仙
列者前
七有
須慎璧
取列者亦年年增多 法者多增數間三因該義學學童來應考者及 甄別之法雖甚嚴肅亦甚众平雖有 因前歲初增獎賞之歎二因該義學入甄別之 善嘖有繁言似不甘服者然彼亦明, 仙兹三年間其數相去若是之遠未嘗無故一 有善故以該掌教等初嫌甄別之法未 九毫去年則領銀四千八百一十一元五毫三 有不識者但前監督學院如此寬容實 千八百七十七年則領銀三千七百五十二元 因考溫習之書數行加以此款幾何見 八百七十六年則領銀一千七百零七大元一 照前定章限錯若干字一歎未免太寬 十七名而該義學所領國家獎賞之項在一千 須依前監督學院所定章程乃不違例 年時則有四百五十九名去年時則有五百五 慎考察但甄別之法敝監院未便自專 十六年時則有三百九十名一千八百七十七 璧者艮以學童被取若是之多固宜詳 十七間其中學童歲杪來應考者一千八百七 知此言稍宜撙節蓋瑜中有瑕未臻全 間一千八百七十七年有十四間而去年則有 多此事足徵該教法遞年較勝而亦要 致於聖會義學於一千八百七十六年有十二 該義學學童每百名中被取列者雖甚 程亦能通變故欲畧爲整肅此其時
年數增
間獎其
則領
銀領
童義
及之
故
嘖善
故識
該但
習
掌前 前書
ntage of passes, although it
teady increase of efficiency,
no salis. The examina-
isses resulted were con-
inute and painstaking
ow certain printed rules
the number of mistak
These rules are far too
ubjects, they make a failure
in an ordinarily well taught
ecessor had very good reason e liberality, because the teachers
rejudices against and were
mit to the Grant-in-aid ex-
w that the examinations
T scheme are well under-
1.1.1.
其雖
甄如
未乃
寬幾免不便
時有 法容
₤知未實見!
詳全要
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.