(L
看着
THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 23RD APRIL, 1881.
increased, the population had been augmented,
two thousand new houses had been built, and whilst the inhabitants of the City of Victoria
became more numerous, both by births and by immigration from the Kwang-tung province,
crime had diminished. But this was owing to
the industry of the people, to their loyal and orderly disposition, and perhaps to some extent
also to the practical advice he himself had received
from time to time from those competent to give it as to the best mode of governing a Chinese community.
Her Majesty's Government had recognized this
also in dealing with one of the subjects the depu-
tation had mentioned, that ofkidnapping. Much
had been done of late years to detect and punish
this crime; and in 1879, Chief Justice Sir JOHN
SMALE made a public utterance on the subject
which deservedly attracted great attention, His
Honour very frankly remarking that he was sorry
he had not noticed the matter before. But before
the Chief Justice had noticed the evil in question,
the gentleman who had introduced the deputation,
and other gentlemen present had drawn the
attention of the Government to it.
His Excellency then read the following extract
from a despatch of the Earl of KIMBERLEY on the subject, dated Downing Street, 20th May, 1880:--
"With regard to kidnapping, the provisions of “the local law (Ordinance 4 of 1865 and 2 of “1875) ought to be sufficiently stringent, but "it appears that, the practice being on the “increase, certain Chinese gentlemen in Novem-
“ber 1878 asked permission to form themselves "into an Association for its prevention, and that a "Committee appointed by you to enquire into "the subject suggested that the petitioners should "form themselves into a Company for the purpose "under the 'Companies Ordinance, 1865'.
"quest that you will at once thank these Chinese “gentlemen for their offers of assistance in re- "pressing this form of crime, and that you will “allow. them to form themselves into an Asso- “ciation of whatever kind they desire. But in
"order to obtain official recognition, its rules and
organization should be made known to and (approved by the Colonial Government. You “will, of course, give them such assistance as you "may find practicable, and especially you will "instruct the Police to co-operate with them in "bringing to justice all offenders whom they may "succeed in tracing. If the Association as at "first organized should be found insufficient, it "will be time then to consider what other steps "should be taken."
The wisdom of Lord KIMBERLEY's decision was to be seen in the fact that a considerable number of the kidnappers punished for the last twelve months had been detected and brought to justice by this Association of Chinese gentlemen. He might also remind them that in passing his Ordi-
nance No. 2 of 1875, Governor Sir ARTHUR KENNEDY had mentioned that he had introduced it at the solicitation of the leading members of the Chinese community.
I re-
究逮
立該
該嚴言此
辦此弊
等查
華節
究辦此固足徵其言之智也又可憶前港督堅大人議定一千八百七十五年第二條則例時嘗言明提舉該則例乃因華民紳商懇禀所致 逮之處然後酌量善法陸續增入未爲晚也讀畢制軍乃云智哉鈴大臣之言卽邇來匝歲之間所有拐徒多被科罪實因藉此華人保局所助稽查 貴部堂所見以爲方便者尤有要者卽飭總巡捕廳飭令役與彼同心協力凡可跟踪必須助之追捕到案該公司初立制度未周嗣後見有不 弊之法並仰 貴部堂准併設立公司不論若何無庸拘泥但若如欲國家認之榮之則必將規制條陳禀請批准諒 貴部堂必樂之使彼明悟 該委員等覆稱最善莫如任由該遞禀人遵依一千八百六十五年公司則例設立公司等語爲此煩 貴部堂致謝華人紳商倡舉襄助國家禁除此 嚴辦現查華人爲此弊端日增故於一千八百七十八年十一月時禀懇 國家恩准設立公司以期杜絕拐風又查得 貴部堂嘗派員稽查此事而 此事一節選出對衆誦云至於拐帶一端照香港所有律例卽一千八百六十五年第四條則例及一千八百七十五年第二條則例如此案情本應 此弊之時已先爲諧首事前導之人與同座諧公倡舉禀請 國家懲辦矣 燕制軍將奉准 藩政大臣鈐一千八百八十年五月二十日咨文內 於一千八百七十九年時評論此事於公堂致使多人爲之感激按當日司馬理廉訪坦然云曩者未嘗慎此弊端殊堪腕惜詎司馬理廉訪未嘗註意 隨時襄助本部堂以善治華民之法諸公所言拐帶一節向者 英廷辦理該事亦知之稔矣故歷來竭心力以稽查究辦犯此之人憶司馬理廉訪 育繁滋產諾港地或則徙由東粵願作編氓夫如是雖民數日增而犯刑罹罪者則遞年減少推原其故固由百姓之勤勞忠藎良善亦因獲諳練之人 人所致居多也誠然邇來四年間香港產業價值日昻戶口人丁數亦增益新建屋宇不下二千間之多且也威克多理阿城内居民日增其數或因孕
將爲
規此以
提拐追條
謝查十
必舉嘗則
樂襄派
致局嗣之國稻
所後
助助
稽有
查不悟
内意
司獲
277
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.