Mr. SMITH then proposed the following resolu-
tion for acceptance by the Board :-
"That, having regard to the loss of time and to the inconvenience likely to be occasioned, more
particularly to the pupils, by further delay, the Board proceed to examine the School on the basis
THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 5TH FEBRUARY, 1881.
珍湛歐蓋 歐湛歐歐湛律湛歐黎
參有允參牧牧師牧牧賞
贊贊師士師贊師
71
贊
謂
所謂茂謂发贊
以有院 爲題 將目他 該自則 題然謂 目可如
授以有 該交向
of the Grant-in-aid Scheme as placed before us by Dr. EITEL and approved by the Head Master,
the Examiners having due regard to the circum-
stance that the School has already undergone a
Masters' examination, now nearly concluded, and
that the work of the School has not been carried
on with a view to benefits to be derived under that Scheme, and that further the Examiners
reserve to themselves the privilege of asking for
the production of such examination papers and
of taking such assistance from the teachers as
may seem to them just and reasonable."
Mr. LECHLER having seconded this resolution,
Dr. CHALMERS said he was entirely opposed to it
unless the papers already begun by the pupils of
the School were completed by them.
Dr. EITEL asked if the examination papers
were required by the Board as a basis for their
examination, or merely to compare the results of these
with the eventual results of a new papers
and independent examination by the Board.
Dr. CHALMERS said he had already seen the
papers, at least some of them.
The motion of Mr. SMITH being put to the vote,
it was agreed to by all, with the exception of Dr. CHALMERS, who remarked he had doubts whether
he would have time to go through this examina- tion, and said that this was a violent proceeding, dangerous to the School.
The details of the scheme arranged by Dr. EITEL for the examination of the School in English were then formally accepted, the Acting Head Master, Mr. ARTHUR, having been called in and assured the Board that he had considered the details, in consultation. with Dr. STEWART, who also agreed with him in saying that this scheme was fair to the School.
Dr. EITEL next explained the details of the scheme he had drawn up, in consultation with
Dr. STEWART and Mr. ARTHUR, for the examina- tion of the School in Chinese, and proposed
that Dr. CHALMERS should conduct this examina- tion, assisted by Mr. NG CHOY and Dr. WONG, as a Sub-Committee.
Dr. CHALMERS said that if the examination be- gun by the Masters was not to be finished first, he would decline to act on a Sub-Committee.
Dr. EITEL then read the list he had prepared,
in consultation with Dr. STEWART and Mr. AR- THUR, of the special subjects in which some of the classes were to be examined, and proposed that the Government Analyst, Mr. HUGH MACCALLUM, should be invited to assist the Board in the examination of the Chemistry Classes. This proposal was agreed to by all the Members of the Board.
The Acting Head Master, in reply to a question,
stated that if he were asked to produce the finished and unfinished papers of the Masters' examina- tion, he would produce them at once.
*
明經
徒獨該
問助 故 與非與甄者
甄者倡經局以本 史准史別不議看內上局 掌該掌英服者該諸之 院教院文於題人議考 及師及之行投目本端試 鴉先鴉法此名抑局 打竣打衆次時或或 我湛有 先所先皆甄除其要牧 生出討生释生允別湛中看師
·師可 所開所諾之牧數該謂 謂取 酌考酌事師條題如該 甄者甄請叉外 自此 別則別署謂無 用斷師 該不該掌此不
作不所 書允書院乃允 甄允凝
甄 院入院進猛協 別協 特該生來烈 之必目 欸分徒詢之
根先觀 局漢他 本將看 或該並 要學請
使是教
彼將師
作
該
竣
學
寳童
先生所酌甄別
該書
旧討該教師擬定之題目所未竣試者必卽交出 院特欸之法朗誦一遍並舉國家化學師麥加霖助本局甄別化學】歎此議端局内同人無不和衷
隨題
之他
法則
交出獨是將該學童所未受未作之題目如此交他則是故違 督憲所特筋者 湛牧師謂竊以為將該題目授該生徒使彼作愛實爲有益乃不克隨將所樂用之法以甄別究竟不知何故又謂倘不准此則不允進分局只在總局辦
文他誠
志自用作甄別之根本或要自專從新特行甄別然後將取錄者與該題目比較若何
牧院
伍車
酌
叙彼
王謂
特
甄實
別
起害
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.