660490-1888-Bill-read-The-Unclaimed-Balances-Ordinance — Page 2

THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 11TH FEBRUARY, 1888.

5. Whenever any sum other than the balance of an Intestate Estate, shall remain five years unclaimed in the Supreme Court, it shall be lawful for the Court on the application of the Registrar, to order that such sum be paid over to the Treasurer for transfer to the General Revenue of the Colony subject to refund as provided in the last section. Before making the said order the said Court may order such notices to be given and to such parties as the said Court shall think fit.

6. This Ordinance and the Unclaimed Balances Ordi- nance No. 7 of 1885 shall be read together as one Ordi-

nance.

Sums un- claimed in Registry to be paid over.

ThisOrdinance

to be rend with No. 7 et 1885.

SCHEDULES.

(A.)

Notice is hereby given that if the sums hereinafter mentioned are not claimed within six months from this date, they will be trans- ferred to the General Revenue of this Colony.

this

Supreme Court, Hongkong,

day of

188

ALFRED G. WISE› Acting Registrar.

SUMMARY COURT DEPOSITS.

November 28th, 1882.

By Speechly v. Webster,

Suit No.

Chan Yau v. Li Kam,

167 of 1877,...$ 4.22 988 of 1877,... 3.48

17

Poon Lai Sau v. Revena,.

236 of 1878,...

1.50

11

Lo U. R. S. Neate,.......

1061 of 1877,...

14.21

Cheung Kwong v. Yang Cheong,... Chui Pune. Aitken,

605 of 1874,...

1.32

"

547 of 1878,...

9.45

,, Cheung Kun & another v. Li Ling

Shing,

"

881 of 1878,...

4.00

ور

Lee Fat e. Australian S. N. Cụ

128 of 1879,...

14.00

95

19

Dayoormell v. Bryant,.

748 of 1879,... 16.00

"

A. F. Smith e. Ho Tai,.

910 of 1879,...

4.34

,, Rajah Singh v. Abdool Khan,

504 of 1879,...

1.00

*

Lee Ahmoon v. Low Mun-po,.

868 of 1879,...

16.13

"J

"

Mak Sew Wan v. Hon Chong,

980 of 1879,

8.75

LATE

""

"

U Kwan Cheong. Klampermeyer,

""

240 of 1880,... 12.65

Kwan Mi-ho v. W. M. B. Arthur,

471 of 1880,...

2.40

:)

17

"}

,, Fong Wing Shau v. T. I. Bowler,

Yeung-fu e. Norman,

897 of 1880,...

0.25

37

Chau Leung-fu . Wong Pun

Sheong,

1056 of 1880,...

8.40

7

"

475 of 1881,... 3.25

Lam U-lai v. Betts,

589 of 1881,... 28.50

19

Chau Wa Hir. Chung Wing.

Suits Nos. 1009 to 1024. Balance

750 of 1881,...

0.20

32

29

of Sale,

,, 1009/1024 of 1881,

10.39

12

Li Chi v. Ng Kam,

"

189 of 1881,...

1.34

M. H. Madar v. Ho Tim,

140 of 1882,... 25.00

27

Suit No. 496. Balance of Sale,,

496 of 1882.... 10.50

}}

21

13

Utter Singh v. Mahomed,

245 of 1882,...

1.10

፡፡

>>

Suit No. 939. Tsang A-choy v.

Ho Kam Moon. Balance of Sale,

**

939 of 1882,...

9.23

Chun Kwai v. Dare,

of 1882,...

1.00

>>

December 1st, 1882.

By Lui Pek-tsz v. Cheung Kan, ......Suit No. 618,

By Li Pat Hing v. Leung Yon,

9.61

March 1st, 1883.

Suit No. 255,

June 9th, 1883.

0.99

By Wong Ju Chiu z. Yew Luk, .......Suit No. 649,

Same v. Mau Kow,

7.78

656,

3.16.

;;

1

June 11th, 1883.

By Wong Ju Chiu e. Mok Yung, ......Suit No. 655,

6.92

June 25th, 1883.

By Wong Yiu Chew e. Tang Wing,...Suit No. 338,

8.00

July 20th, 1883.

By Wong Yiu Chew 7. Lec A-kee,....Suit No. 653,

4.50

$256.57

133