655972-1890-Ordinance-10-of-1890-assented-to — Page 42

Γ

THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 12TH JULY, 1890.

under the within-written recognisance, but no goods have been sold thereunder.

And the said

bas applied to me the undersigned

to cancel (or mitigate) the forfeiture of the said recognisance, and has given security to my satisfaction for the future performance of the condition of the said recognisance, and has paid, (or given security for payment of) the costs incurred in respect of the forfeiture thereof (ur insert such other condition as the Magistrate may think just).

Therefore the said forfeiture is hereby cancelled (or mitigated to the sum of

Dated the

18

day of

(Signed),

A Magistrate, &c.

[Seal]

FORM XXXI,

Summons to attend an application for varying or dispensing with securities.—(Sec. 51.)

IN THE POLICE COURT AT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY

To A.B.

of

OF HONGKONG,

You are hereby summoned to appear before a Magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at

the

on

in the

day of at the hour of

noon to shew cause why the amount for which it is proposed that the suret of should be bound should not be reduced (or why the obligation of to find suret should not be dispensed with).

Dated the

18

day of

(Signed).

A. Magistrate, &c.

[Scal]

FORM XXXIII.

Order varying order for sureties.--(Sec. 31.)

IN THE POLICE COURT AT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY OF HONGKONG.

Before J.P.. Esquire, a Magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said Police Court,

The

day of

18

A.B. has been under a warrant of commitment dated the

day of

and issued by this Court committed to prison for default in finding sureties (or a surety) in the sum of

And on new evidence having been produced to me (or on proof of a change of circunstances having been given to me), it seems to me just to vary in manner hereinafter appearing the order under which the said warrant was issued.

Therefore it is ordered that the amount for which it is proposed that the sureties (or surety) of the said A.B. should be bound be re- duced to

(or that the obligation of the said A.B, to find a surety (or sureties) be dispensed with (or as may be directed).

(Signed),

A. Magistrate, &c.

[Seal.]

FORM XXXIV.

Oral or written acknowledgment of undertaking to pay a sum adjudged by a conviction.~[See, 53 (1).]

IN THE POLICE COURT AT VICTORIA IN THE COLONY

OF HONGKONG.

A.B. (hereinafter called the defendant) was this day (or was on the

day of

) convicted before the undersigned (or J. P.. Esquire,) a Magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at

for that he (state offence), and it was adjudged by the said conviction that the defendant should pay (us in the conviction) and it was thereby ordered that the defendant should be at liberty to give to the satisfaction of a Magistrate of the said Colony (or as in the conriction) security in the sum of

with

suret in the sum of (each) for the payment of the said sum at the time and in the manner by the said conviction directed.

Now, therefore, I the defendant, as principal, and we C.D. of

as sureties (or I, C.D. of

and E.F. of

as surety) hereby undertake that the defendant will pay the sum ad- judged by the said conviction at the time and in the manner thereby directed, and I the said defendant and we (or I) the said sureties (or surety) hereby severally acknowledge ourselves bound to forfeit and pay to the Magistrate's clerk (or other person specified) the sum of in case the defendant fails to perform this undertaking.

(Signed), (where not taken orally) A.B. Defendant. C.D. }

Suretics,

E.F.j

Taken (orally) before me the (Signed),

day of

A Magistrate, &c.

703