225553-1936-Ordinances-passed-and-assented-to--Def — Page 53

144

THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, JANUARY 31, 1936.

FORM NO. 93.

[8. 118E (ii)].

Recognizance to prosecute appeal with due diligence.

HONG KONG.

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

The form of recognizance will be the same as in Form No. 28 supra, but the condition indorsed will be as follows]:

The condition of the within-written recognizance is such that if the within-bounden

shall with diligence prosecute

a certain appeal to a judge of the Supreme Court of Hong Kong from a conviction [or sentence] of J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony dated the

day of

then the within- written recognizance shall be void, but otherwise shall remain in full force and effect.

>

19

7

HONG KONG.

FORM NO. 94.

(s. 118E (iv)].

Recognizance of Appeal.

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

[The form of recognizance will be the same as in Form No. 28 supra, but the condition indorsed will be as follows]:-

19

The condition of the within-written recognizance is such that if he the said

shall personally appear and surrender himself at the Supreme Court before the judge thereof at each and every hearing of his appeal from a conviction [or sentence] of J.P., Esquire, a magistrate, dated the

day of to such judge and at the final determination of such appeal and then and there abide by the judgment of the said judge and not depart or be absent from such Court at any such hearing without the leave of the said judge, and in the meantime not to depart out of the Colony of Hong Kong, then this recognizance to be void or else to stand in full force and effect.