189388-1932-Ordinances-passed-and-assented-to--Summary-Offences-No-40-of-1932-Magistrates-No-41-of-1932-Registration-of-United-Kingdom-Patents--No-42-of-1932-Protection-of-Women-and-Girls-Amendment-No-43-of-1932 — Page 71

1254 THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, DECEMBER 9, 1932.

FORM No. 31.

[ss. 22 and 59.]

Order cancelling or mitigating forfeiture of recognizance, (To be indorsed on recognizance).

HONG KONG.

IN THE OLICE COURT AT

Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said police court.

day of

19

7

A warrant of distress was, on the issued for levying the sum of

declared to be forfeited under the within-written recognizance, but no goods have been sold thereunder; and the said

has applied to me, the undersigned, to cancel [or mitigate] the forfeiture of the said recognizance, and has given security to my satisfaction for the future performance of the condition of the said recognizance, and has paid [or given security for payment of the costs incurred in respect of the forfeiture thereof [or insert such other condition as the magistrate may think just]: There. fore the said forfeiture is hereby cancelled [or mitigated to the sum

1.

of

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

(Signed.)

19

>

Magistrate.

1

FORM No. 32.

[ss. 22 and 56.]

Summons to attend an application for varying or

dispensing with sureties.

Hong KoNG,

IN THE POLice Court aT

To A.B., of

You are hereby summoned to appear before a magistrate of the said Colony sitting at

19

at

1

on

day the

o'clock in the

day of noon, to show cause why the amount for which it is proposed that the suret

of should be bound should not be reduced [or why the to find a surety [or sureties] should not be

obligation of dispensed with].

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

19

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

FORM No. 33.

[s. 56.]

HUNG KONG,

Order varying order for sureties.

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

Before J.P., Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said police court.

The

day of

19

1

day

C.D. has been, under a warrant of commitment dated the of

19 and issued by this court committed to prison for default in finding sureties [or a surety] in the sum of and, on new evidence having been produced to me [or on proof of a change of circumstances having been given to me], it seems to me just to vary, in manner hereinafter appearing, the order under which the said warrant was issued: Therefore it is ordered that the amount for which it is proposed that the surety [or sureties] of the said C.D. should be bound he reduced to

[or that the obligation of the said C.D. to find a surety [or sureties] be dispensed with] [or as may be directed].

[L.S.]

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

!