explained in para 7 of the letter of 7 June 1993. The summary
below of the build and leasing options serves to demonstrate conclusively that building is still much the more economic
solution:
Build new offices (all Consulate
General and British Council) and
7 UK staff flats..
Lease new offices (Consulate
..NPV £32.8m
Appendix A
General and British Council) and
7 UK staff flats..
NPV £77.7m
Appendix B
4. We have carried out a further risk analysis of the project
and conclude that those identified in para 8 of my letter of 7
June will continue to be the main risks.
5.
Our Ministers have accepted our proposed course of action to proceed with the project at a total estimate cost within
£29.0 million. I should be grateful for your agreement to
proceed as soon as possible. Time is important in order to
keep to programme for occupation by 1 July 1996.
6. Para 7 of your letter under reference asked us to explore the scope for phasing the development and whether that would have a favourable bearing on the economics/costs of the
project.
The works have already been phased to bring forward
the demolition, site formation and foundation contracts prior
to completion of the detailed design of the superstructure. This has allowed us to speed up the programme and thereby take advantage of the present competitive market in the construction industry in Hong Kong. scope for phasing the project without delaying the eventual
completion and risking escalating construction costs. It is
an important political objective for HMG that the
There is little further
It.marr.NATjoyce
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.