33-APR-1993
16:29
BRITISH EMBASSY PARIS
16 1 42 66 91 42
P.17
13
and the recourse of a fordi
GREY KA MAYAMli mgaum M
auðunni ka nukemdita AVIMURRA
SYNLA MWENI
ana dapaÏu Äišamanı
MAKAMPU MEDI
matters.
Cumimy in welzi is siatou in the rowmio, dus de bvdh roig socious practical mini moviesNE
reasons to say that the recourse made by a foreign government against a refusal to extradite
cannot be entertained.
which
If the decraa gresting the surradition can ba tuhlast to a recourse for breach of the law by tha
individual in question, this is on the one hand in the interest of individual liberty, and because
the uranita of 1017.
* å matter of Franch Internal law and is applicahla in tha pennadura
of extradition, grants procidural guarantees to the individual (on the idea that the procedural
guarantees are given in favour of the individual in extradition matters, see N'Guyen Quoc and
others, International Public Law, 3rd edition no. 333) and therefore, the decree, Inasmuch at it
grants the extradition, is, as stated by the Conseil di Etarin its decision of Zöd July 1965 (Dame ̈ ́
Solis Estarita quoted above), detachable from the international relations of France.
There are many other reasons.
In reality, international treaties are not normally a part of the internal legal system of the States,
except in so far as the treaties themselves decide otherwise; they are binding as a matter of
principle only on the governments (née Rousseau, International Public Law, Volume 1
Introduction and Courses a 164: Casrama, Procent International Publie Lam
KAVUUSIN ASTYNKOMSTUTINE A MAČKAN ABTEI
Of course, international treaties, once introduced in French internal law, are mandatory and by
virtue of Article 55 of the French constitution, they even have an authority higher than the
statutes; but it is obvious that they are only enforceable, internally, inasmuch as they have been
introxiuced in the internal system.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.