TNAG-2942-FCO40-4218-Future-of-Hong-Kong-nationality-ethnic-minorities-1993 — Page 55

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Please return to me

Foreign & Commonwealth

Office

FILE

COPY 119 ༼༡༽

2) MBS

که دو تا بانان

1) Mr Motion

Bliss copy lo

ence Copies sent

122/1

Ми

An Hebblewhite Home Offic

Mr Lenny

Lenny HK

21 July 1993

Dv

Villicos

Ни

Abt 22/7.

tren på.

Charles Wardle Esq MP

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

Home Office

Queen Anne's Gate

London

SW1H 9AT

London SWIA 2AH

From The Minister of State

HKCD 340/6.

28 JU 1993

this BJ

ہو

J22h

22

سمك

Year Charles

You wrote to me on 12 May to confirm your thinking on the position of the non-Chinese ethnic minorities in Hong Kong; which was that they had adequate safeguards and that there was no question of introducing primary legislation to make specific citizenship provision for them. This is the line that Ministers have subsequently taken. I have thought it worth writing to you again on this question, given the Parliamentary attention accorded to it recently (and culminating in debate in the House of Lords on 15 July). I would also like to raise with you a second Hong Kong nationality issue - that of British citizenship for the wives and widows of ex-servicemen.

Looking at the ground covered during discussion of the ethnic minorities in the Adjournment debate on 13 July, and the debate in the Lords prompted by Lord Bonham Carter's motion, what comes over is considerable sympathy for the Hong Kong position (supported by LegCo and by the Governor) that the Government should accommodate their request for citizenship and, as one speaker put it in the Lords' debate, considerable doubts as to whether the Government's assurances have stood the test of time. The Foreign Affairs Committee pressed me on this too when I gave evidence on 14 July in advance of their visit to Hong Kong and Peking in October. I undertook to draw to the Home Secretary's attention their request for further consideration of the case of the ethnic minorities (I enclose the relevant extract from the record).

On the wives and widows of ex-servicemen, I quite accept that primary legislation is not an option. But I am wondering whether there might not be scope to demonstrate that the

Government

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.