TNAG-2942-FCO40-4218-Future-of-Hong-Kong-nationality-ethnic-minorities-1993 — Page 22

18-AUG-1993 09:54

B4 IND LIVERPOOL

LORD WILSON OF TILLYORN GCMG

44 051 236 3386 P.05

2217/13

HOUSE

OF

LORDS

20 A

34 DANVERS STREET LONDON SW3 5AT TEL: 071-352 1188

:.

..

19 July 1993

u Mr Tou

Mor Griffitt

cawsthame

Mr

M. Walmsle

My Camera

Mr Kelly

for advice and draft reply pls

Neil Rosents 20.7.93

I am afraid you were bombarded with a whole series of arguments from the "Hong Kong mafia" in the debate on the British Nationality Order on Thursday. I thought you made a splendid effort in trying to deal with a whole series of individual points.

For the record, perhaps I could make clear what I was trying to say about not distorting the arrangements made for the British nationality package. In making that point, I was referring to the amendment put forward by Lord McIntosh of Haringey. As I see it, by emphasising the Hong Kong disciplined services, that amendment amounted to a wish to distort the detailed arrangements in favour of that particular group. Given the almost excessively careful mathematical calculations that went into the points system for different categories that would, I believe, be wrong.

I was not, however, trying to argue that the overall figure of 50,000 should be sacrosanct. Indeed, in arguing that the non-Chinese ethnic minorities are a special group, requiring special consideration, I was trying to make the point that they needed to be dealt with in addition to the 50,000.

Rather than seek to interrupt your winding up speech I thought I would put these points in a letter. I do believe that this small group has a strong case for special treatment and I very much hope that, when the arguments put forward in the debate have been reflected on, the Home Office will be able to come up with a solution which allays their fears.

It/