GF 323
CONFIDENTIAL
it
risks
community
2
機齊
criticism
that we
are
being
truculent and confrontational;
proposals, particularly
the
are
unlike So
what
is
of the
EC,
in
respect contemplated in the Basic Law that it would be much easier for the Chinese to justify
their
dismantlement
in
1997
on grounds
incompatibility with the Basic Law;
our
of
credibility will suffer if we are perceived to be
expecting a watered-down outcome;
EXCO is likely to be divided, and LegCo will definitely amend the package substantially.
Second-stage Bill based on 1993 Package?
4.
Pros:
it is arrangements envisaged
will
much
closer than
in
lesser
the
the
Chinese
1992
Basic
package
to
the
Law; as such it
criticism,
and
attract
a lower-calibrated reaction;
it broadly conforms with the sort of package that the majority of LegCo members expect us to put forward, and would probably be acceptable to the community;
consequently,
EXCO
it will probably find
(although
few a
EXCO
easier passage
liberals will be
through strongly opposed to it). There will likely be strong
pressure
for
further
down, watering
package's basic framework will survive; and
but
the
CONFIDENTIAL
機密
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.