TNAG-2890-FCO40-4162-Reform-and-localisation-of-the-Hong-Kong-Patent-System-1993 — Page 22

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

itself from reliance on the UK Patent Office, there seems no reason to do this before 1997

or before Chinese patents can be registered. A UK patent would seem at least as good a

match for the requirements identified in the PSC report as an EP patent and a good deal

less expensive.

5. We therefore urge that the proposal (in the short term, at least) to restrict the system to

one in which only EP patents can be registered should be reconsidered. If for political

reasons it is expedient to recognise the work of patent offices other than the UK, then we

suggest that from the outset UK, EP and Chinese patents should be registerable.

Time limits for registration in Hong Kong

6. The two stage registration system requiring registration of an application in Hong Kong

within 6 months of publication of an EP application followed by a request for grant in

Hong Kong within 6 months of the grant of an EP patent seems unnecessarily rigid

compared to the current system where applicants need do nothing in Hong Kong until

after their UK or EP(UK) patent is granted. However, we can also see the advantage for

the applicant in filing early in Hong Kong. The proposed system could be made more

flexible by allowing applications in Hong Kong to be filed at any time after the EP

application has been made up to six months after grant of the EP patent. (At the limit, of

course, it would be necessary to register the application and apply for grant in Hong Kong

at the same time.) Clearly those who do not apply early in Hong Kong risk loss of

damages for any infringement occurring in Hong Kong between the making of the EP

patent application and grant of a patent in Hong Kong.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.