TNAG-2880-FCO40-4152-Agreements-between-the-Hong-Kong-Special-Administrative-Regi-1993 — Page 67

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

S 363

}

HOME OFFICE

Queen Anne's Gate London SW1H 9AT

Miss Shelagh Brooks

Legal Counsellor

Legal Advisers

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

London SW1 2AH

BY FAX 071 270 2280

3030

Direct line 071-273 Switchboard 071-273 3000

Your reference

Our reference

Date

ра

37019.

10 December 1993

370/9

Dear Shelagh

(80

UK/HK SURRENDER OF FUGITIVES AGREEMENT

STRY

C

13 DE 1993

DESK OFF.

REGISTRY

INDEX

Action Taken

Thank you for your letter of 6 December, inviting us to comment on the draft negotiating brief for next week's talks. I was also grateful for sight of the letters from Bill Palmer and Ricky Rhoda. Sally Evans and I have discussed all of these, and what follows is a combined response. I should say that in general terms, we were very content with the draft. I have tried, so far as possible, to produce the following comments in relation to the order of the draft Agreement, and the draft brief.

General point

2. Sally has identified a third possible means of dealing with this problem - the making of a Statutory Instrument under paragraph 3(2) of the Schedule to the Hong Kong Act 1985. Each of the three possible means will require careful evaluation, so as to enable a decision to be taken as to the most appropriate route. We do not see any need to amend the brief, but we shall need to bear in mind the need not to commit ourselves to anything more than the current "exploring".

Articles 1 and 2

3. Upon further reflection, we suggest that we ought to have as our objective the removal of Article 1 altogether, and its amalgamation with a revised Article 2. What we have in mind is something along the lines of a compressed version of Articles 1 and 2 of the India Treaty, a copy of which is attached for ease of reference. We certainly want to explore the extent of Hong Kong's extraterritorial jurisdiction, and the principles upon which it is based, but we would not necessarily wish to object, per se, to dealing with offences which have taken place in the PRC (for example, terrorist bombings or hijackings, over which Hong Kong will presumably have jurisdiction by virtue of international Convention). We would be more

95

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.