TNAG-2790-FCO40-4029-Future-of-Hong-Kong-1993 — Page 196

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

:

FED agree with Peking. They have no objection to our issuing a

warning to the Chinese in strong terms, indicating that failure

to pay will result in more stringent measures being considered.

But they consider that the letter should not include any threat

of withdrawal action. If, however, such a warning failed to

produce results, we would need to invoke the stricter measures

we had threatened, and our only option would be to call for the

withdrawal of a diplomatic member of staff.

5.

If we issue letters about unpaid parking fines to If, for diplomatic Missions they should be consistent.

example, the French and the Russians (two of the other recipients) discovered that for political reasons we had given the Chinese special treatment we would have no convincing defence. Ministers have long argued for the need to take tough action against persistent offenders against parking

regulations. this policy.

We should not be selective in the application of

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.