BLOMBARD 3”.
2.3.5
contrary to the GATT which China aspires to join. More importantly, such action is not conducive to creating an atmosphere in which successful talks between the two governments can take place. I imagine it would be best if such a message were conveyed in private discussion between delegation leaders rather than in full session, so as to minimise the risk of leaks.
For obvious reasons, we would not want the specific evidence to be handed over to the Chinese, and I have blanked out names where these appear. More generally it would be damaging to our interests for news of our problems to be more widely disseminated.
Should anything transpire at my meeting with Ma which would justify modifying or withdrawing this request, I will of course let you know. It is also possible, I suppose, that the announcement of talks may lead the Chinese to suspend or modify their measures against us. You may feel it would anyway be better to wait until your arrival in Beijing before taking any action, so as to see whether there is any relief. But I am writing now to let you know our concern, before leaving for the Gulf first thing tomorrow (I can easily be contacted through my office during my absence).
I should be grateful if you would show this letter to the Governor and, if you think appropriate, to Ministers.
Peter Ricketts Esq
Hong Kong Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
King Charles Street
LONDON SW1A 2AH
火
~
wver.
معمود
CHARLES POWELL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.