TNAG-2782-FCO40-4001-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Chinese-policy-1993 — Page 42

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

05-JAN-1993

17:54

CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS BR

+ 852 840 1976 P.02

17

Q.

About the

political system. If LegCo passed Patten's

China's next step? If

A.

political proposals, what's

it's not passed, what'll be your reaction?

We've made it clear. Patten's proposals, we call "3

violations", violating the Joint Declaration, the

Basic Law and past Sino-British pacts on such

too

matters. So we insist they're unacceptable. Many HK

friends ask if both sides could sit down and talk. We

want to talk, but you must have a premise to start the talks. The premise is that Patten must withdraw

his

and talk on the basis of the Basic Law.

What has to be talked about is how to converge with

the Basic Law. We can only start from there. Amending Patten's proposals to produce a package is

not acceptable to us.

That won't be a package of

proposals

convergence.

train.

In 1997 it can't go on the through

If Britain must act. unilaterally, force LegCo

to pass such a package. Today (30.12.92), I saw in

the newspapers, the British HK Government said if

LegCo passed the package, it will be implemented. In 1997, if the new sovereign state thinks that there is convergence, she will set up a new stove. She will start anew. That's not a co-operative attitude. This

shows Britain is dead set against convergence. If

this happens, we'll have to take steps. We'll have to

start afresh.

no

..

Will China take other tough actionst

A.

That depends on Britain's attitude I've said on this

matter.

We'll take reactive measures. We must see

Britain's attitude.

I She stands tough, I've said

I'll have to follow suit, to the end.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.