SECRET
DESKBY
that it might be held in reserve.
3. We do not believe that the draft to be discussed with ExCo need to include the other detailed points in Cox's letter of 10 November: in particular we do not share his view on omitting the prospective sentence on subversion. This is the central issue in the drafting of the oath, and in our view has to be tackled in the first draft.
HURD
YYYY
ΜΑΙΝ
HK POLICY
NNNN
ST
Catchword:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.