5.
a.
b.
How many of your returned award holders have you been able to make use of and in what ways? (A nil return could indicate that earlier years' selection of candidates was not well targetted).
Can you quote any public local comments during the year
on the value of (i) FCOSAS, or (ii) a British educational experience in general?
6.
a.
What rating did you give to the FCOSAS in your 1992 TMR
return?
b.
Has that rating changed in the interim? Up or down? Why?
7.
a.
How many jointly funded awards did you operate in
1992/93?
b.
What was the value of the co-sponsorship raised for
those awards?
C.
What new local joint funding have you secured in the past year? Do you have a specific target for expansion? (SP2.6)
8.
a.
b
How does the impact/effectiveness of the FCOSAS compare with similar programmes operated by our main competitors
(USA, Canada, France, Germany, Australia, etc)? Are
they spending more/less than the UK?
Do you think we might usefully copy any of their procedures to increase FCOSAS effectiveness?
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.