CONFIDENTIAL
機密
it
risks
community
criticism that we are being
truculent and confrontational;
the
are
proposals,
OS
particularly in respect of the EC,
unlike what is contemplated in the Basic Law
that it would be much easier for the Chinese to justify
their
оп grounds of
dismantlement
in
1997
incompatibility with the Basic Law;
our credibility will suffer if we are perceived to be expecting a watered-down outcome; and
EXCO is likely to be divided, and LegCo will definitely
amend the package substantially.
Second-stage Bill based on 1993 Package?
4.
Pros
it is much closer than the 1992
arrangements envisaged in the
will
attract
lesser
a lower-calibrated reaction;
package to the
Basic
Chinese
Law; as such it
criticism, and
it broadly conforms with the sort of package that the
majority of LegCo members expect us to put forward, and
would probably be acceptable to the community;
consequently, it will probably find easier passage
through EXCO (although a few EXCO liberals will be
strongly opposed
it). There will likely be strong
pressure
for further watering down, but
to
package's basic framework will survive; and
the
GF 323
CONFIDENTIAL 機密
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.