CONFIDENTIAL
021/
MDHIAN 36
4. NOR IS THERE ANY REALISTIC PROSPECT OF PERSUADING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE TO DELAY DISCUSSION OF THE SUBJECT BY LEGCO. EVEN IF SHE WANTED TO HELP, THERE IS NO CREDIBLE PRETEXT SHE COULD USE FOR SUCH A DELAY. IF SHE DISCLOSED THE TRUE REASON, THIS COULD ONLY CAUSE RESENTMENT ON THE PART OF LEGCO MEMBERS AND WOULD NOT HAVE THE LEAST EFFECT ON THEIR DETERMINATION TO PASS THE RESOLUTION ACCORDING TO THEIR INTENDED SCHEDULE I.E. ON 13 OCTOBER.
5. WE AGREE TO YOUR SUGGESTION TO STRENGTHEN THE PROPOSED PRESS LINE (LAST SENTENCE IN PARA. 4 OF YOUR TUR).
PATTEN
YYYY
DISTRIBUTION
64
ΜΑΙΝ
57
.HK POLICY
HKD
PUSD
FED
LEGAL ADVISERS//MS BARRETT LEGAL ADVISERS//MISS BROOKS
NEWS D
NTCD
PLANNERS
RAD
PS
PS/MR GOODLAD
SIR J COLES
MR HUM
ADDITIONAL
7
CAOFF//SIR R BRAITHWAITE (DIO) CAOFF //MISS NEVILLE-JONES
CAOFF//MR SIBSON
PS NO 10.
NNNN
PAGE 2 CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.