SECRET
It
How important to us is the LegCo "through train"? would avoid disruption in 1997 and pre-empt a Chinese-run election that year on terms which we could not influence. But is this continuity worth a significant watering down of the Governor's proposals?
Could we accept that any members of LegCo should be removed in 1997 on the basis of a judgement that they did not uphold the Basic Law, even if most members of
the "through train" remained on board?
How can we best preserve Hong Kong's autonomy after
1997: by building up strong political institutions before 1997, or making the compromises necessary to secure Chinese agreement that the structures in place
in 1997 will continue?
4.
- How far should we go to satisfy the community's
evident desire for a cooperative relationship with China and certainty beyond 1997?
By their nature, these questions do not lend themselves
to black and white answers. But the shade of grey we are seeking will influence shorter term judgements.
How Can We Achieve Our Objectives?
We now face a choice between talks with China in an
effort to narrow differences, or passing the ball to LegCo
and leaving it to LegCo members to decide whether to make
amendments, and to clear these with China.
5.
Hong Kong opinion seems to be firmly in favour of talks
between Britain and China (no doubt because the general
expectation is that they will resolve the present dispute).
6.
HongKongissuesahead/BRIEFS/NJH
SECRET
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.