CONFIDENTIAL
geographical constituencies. And it is no closer to the Basic Law model than the present proposal. Options B and C look to be non-starters.
- A possible advantage of Option A, not mentioned in the
ExCo paper, is that it would put in place an arrangement which could provide the basis for the Selection and Election Committees in the Basic Law. The Chinese will face the same difficulties as we are doing in trying to translate the vague models in the Basic Law into a system which would be credible in Hong Kong (even if they are not as scrupulous as we will be about fair elections). If we can solve some of the problems for them, and leave a structure which could, with small adjustments (eg inclusive of a "religion" category, inclusion of NPC and CPPCC delegates) be shown to be consistent with the Basic Law model, we may find that our basic structure lives on beyond 1997. That would be quite attractice and although not an advantage we could trumpet in public, it is something we could use in private explanation of reason for change. I also agree with the point made by John Chan about non- duplication (para 7 of Hong Kong telno 73).
3. I would be interested in addressees' thoughts. If we are to comment, we should try to do so by about 20 January So that our thoughts are received before HKG closes down for Chinese New Year. I have already alerted Hong Kong to the point that if the Governor on ExCo's advice decides to change his proposals, we will need to consult OPD (K).
PF Ricketts
18 January 1993
changes.elc.PETER
JEB
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.