TNAG-2717-FCO40-3923-House-of-Commons-Select-Committee-on-Foreign-Affairs-enquiry-1993 — Page 7

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

settle for the best terms we can get... I do not consider that as

giving China an absolute veto. I do not consider that Co-

operation with China in the interests of Hong Kong, which has always been the course I have advocated, means acquiescence in

everything the Chinese say. It means, and always has meant,

tough negotiations. But when you come to the crunch, and when you consider the interests of Hong Kong, it is better to have a

settlement rather than to have a lasting confrontation which, as

I will try to show to the Committee, will only damage Hong Kong

and leave it worse of than it began.

Chairman: Sir Percy, if I may just intervene, do you

relate these problems, this tragedy, entirely to the Governor's

reform package? Is it not the position, as I think we were told in Hong Kong, that China was already being extremely difficult over very important issues related to the transition phase before

October 1992 and that these difficulties seemed to be

accumulating even before Mr Patten stood up and made his

proposals.

Sir Percy Cradock: I do not accept that for a moment,

Chairman. I will explain why. The Chinese have always been. difficult over Hong Kong, which is a very sensitive issue for

them, even in the best years of co-operation after the 1984

agreement. After 1989, that is Tiananmen, they became even more difficult and I do not deny that for a moment. Dealing with them has always required the most extraordinary reserves of ingenuity and patience. But that is a very different matter from saying

that all this problem, as you describe it, was there before Mr

Patten came. We were in a tolerable position in earlier 1992.

The Chinese saw, and see, the Patten reforms as a

fundamental change of course on the part of the British

Government. They see them as going back, a breach, of the

political and constitutional settlement we reached with them on

the basis of the 1984

1984 agreement and the 1990 agreement on directly elected seats. They believe they have been cheated.

They feel extremely strongly about it. I am not saying that they are right or that they are politically justified or legally justified: that is not germane to what I am saying. I am saying

:

4

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.